1981American Journal of Medical GeneticsRequires access

A cost‐benefit analysis of prenatal detection of down syndrome and neural tube defects in older mothers

A. Dessa Sadovnick, Patricia A. Baird, John M. Opitz

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Infants of older mothers have an increased risk of Down syndrome. As public awareness of this disorder increases, so does the number of women requesting prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age. A cost-benefit analysis was done to determine the maternal age for which screening for Down syndrome is cost-beneficial. The analysis took into account the cases of neural tube defects which would be detected "incidentally" on amniocentesis, as all amniotic fluid samples have alpha fetoprotein levels measured. British Columbia (B.C.) provides a unique opportunity for such a study: single-year maternal age risk figures for Down syndrome based on virtually complete ascertainment are available; the Department of Medical Genetics Prenatal Diagnosis Clinic is the main referral centre for the province; B.C. has a universal medicare system which facilitates the calculation of medical costs and gives all women financially equal access to prenatal diagnosis. The study concludes that prenatal screening for Down syndrome is cost beneficial for women 34 years old or older at conception. A discount rate of 14% was chosen for this analysis and the effect of such a rate on the results is discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Infants of older mothers have an increased risk of Down syndrome. As public awareness of this disorder increases, so does the number of women requesting prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age. A cost-benefit analysis was done to determine the maternal age for which screening for Down syndrome is cost-beneficial. The analysis took into account the cases of neural tube defects which would be detected "incidentally" on amniocentesis, as all amniotic fluid samples have alpha fetoprotein levels measured. British Columbia (B.C.) provides a unique opportunity for such a study: single-year maternal age risk figures for Down syndrome based on virtually complete ascertainment are available; the Department of Medical Genetics Prenatal Diagnosis Clinic is the main referral centre for the province; B.C. has a universal medicare system which facilitates the calculation of medical costs and gives all women financially equal access to prenatal diagnosis. The study concludes that prenatal screening for Down syndrome is cost beneficial for women 34 years old or older at conception. A discount rate of 14% was chosen for this analysis and the effect of such a rate on the results is discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Infants of older mothers have an increased risk of Down syndrome. As public awareness of this disorder increases, so does the number of women requesting prenatal diagnosis for advanced maternal age. A cost-benefit analysis was done to determine the maternal age for which screening for Down syndrome is cost-beneficial. The analysis took into account the cases of neural tube defects which would be detected "incidentally" on amniocentesis, as all amniotic fluid samples have alpha fetoprotein levels measured. British Columbia (B.C.) provides a unique opportunity for such a study: single-year maternal age risk figures for Down syndrome based on virtually complete ascertainment are available; the Department of Medical Genetics Prenatal Diagnosis Clinic is the main referral centre for the province; B.C. has a universal medicare system which facilitates the calculation of medical costs and gives all women financially equal access to prenatal diagnosis. The study concludes that prenatal screening for Down syndrome is cost beneficial for women 34 years old or older at conception. A discount rate of 14% was chosen for this analysis and the effect of such a rate on the results is discussed.

Key concepts: Amniocentesis, Prenatal diagnosis, Prenatal screening, Down syndrome, Medicine, Referral, Advanced maternal age, Amniotic fluid

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A cost‐benefit analysis of prenatal detection of down syndrome and neural tube defects in older mothers — Research Paper | ScholarLens