2010•SUPSI ARISOpen access

What Can Leaders Learn from Cybernetics? - Toward a Strategic Framework for Managing Complexity and Risk in Socio-Technical Systems

Alberto Gandolfi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

How can leaders cope with the seemingly inexorable increase in complexity of their world? Based on the cybernetic “law of requisite variety,” formulated almost fifty years ago by W. R. Ashby, we propose a pragmatic framework that might help strategic decision makers to face and manage complexity and risk in organizational, political, and social systems. The law of requisite variety is a fundamental hypothesis in the general theory of regulation and defines an upper limit to the controlling ability of a system, based on its “variety” (complexity) level. The strategic framework discussed here assumes that complexity breeds systemic risks and suggests three mutually complementary approaches to managing complexity at a strategic level: 1) where possible, reduce complexity in the system to be controlled; 2) effectively manage residual complexity; and 3) increase complexity of the controlling system. Each approach is then discussed, and practical examples provided.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

How can leaders cope with the seemingly inexorable increase in complexity of their world? Based on the cybernetic “law of requisite variety,” formulated almost fifty years ago by W. R. Ashby, we propose a pragmatic framework that might help strategic decision makers to face and manage complexity and risk in organizational, political, and social systems. The law of requisite variety is a fundamental hypothesis in the general theory of regulation and defines an upper limit to the controlling ability of a system, based on its “variety” (complexity) level. The strategic framework discussed here assumes that complexity breeds systemic risks and suggests three mutually complementary approaches to managing complexity at a strategic level: 1) where possible, reduce complexity in the system to be controlled; 2) effectively manage residual complexity; and 3) increase complexity of the controlling system. Each approach is then discussed, and practical examples provided.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

How can leaders cope with the seemingly inexorable increase in complexity of their world? Based on the cybernetic “law of requisite variety,” formulated almost fifty years ago by W. R. Ashby, we propose a pragmatic framework that might help strategic decision makers to face and manage complexity and risk in organizational, political, and social systems. The law of requisite variety is a fundamental hypothesis in the general theory of regulation and defines an upper limit to the controlling ability of a system, based on its “variety” (complexity) level. The strategic framework discussed here assumes that complexity breeds systemic risks and suggests three mutually complementary approaches to managing complexity at a strategic level: 1) where possible, reduce complexity in the system to be controlled; 2) effectively manage residual complexity; and 3) increase complexity of the controlling system. Each approach is then discussed, and practical examples provided.

Key concepts: Variety (cybernetics), Cybernetics, Complexity management, Complexity theory and organizations, Management science, Face (sociological concept), Limit (mathematics), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Can Leaders Learn from Cybernetics? - Toward a Strategic Framework for Managing Complexity and Risk in Socio-Technical Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens