1970•OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Steam stimulation Tidelands operations, Wilmington oil field

P.B. Kemp

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It has been demonstrated many times over that the producing formations and well bores under waterflood operations in the Wilmington field have been remarkable responsive to the energies of steam. The injection of steam for short periods of time may be classified as one of the best methods known for oil stimulation. Under waterflood, results of the steam stimulation of wells by the cyclic steam-injection method have been reviewed against the frequency of well loss to the several operators producing the field. Because of the increasing water cuts associated with the waterflood mechanism and because of the risk of casing damage and well loss in existing wells not primarily equipped for periodic applications with high temperatures, this method stimulation is being viewed more critically than ever before. A measure of the response in oil-production performance that might be expected under waterflood operations resulting from steam stimulation is discussed. The costs of well-engineered steaming coupled with the costs normally associated with the recovery of oil indicate that minimum tolerance for the cost of well failure and repair should be controllable at no greater than the cost of the steam project itself.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has been demonstrated many times over that the producing formations and well bores under waterflood operations in the Wilmington field have been remarkable responsive to the energies of steam. The injection of steam for short periods of time may be classified as one of the best methods known for oil stimulation. Under waterflood, results of the steam stimulation of wells by the cyclic steam-injection method have been reviewed against the frequency of well loss to the several operators producing the field. Because of the increasing water cuts associated with the waterflood mechanism and because of the risk of casing damage and well loss in existing wells not primarily equipped for periodic applications with high temperatures, this method stimulation is being viewed more critically than ever before. A measure of the response in oil-production performance that might be expected under waterflood operations resulting from steam stimulation is discussed. The costs of well-engineered steaming coupled with the costs normally associated with the recovery of oil indicate that minimum tolerance for the cost of well failure and repair should be controllable at no greater than the cost of the steam project itself.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has been demonstrated many times over that the producing formations and well bores under waterflood operations in the Wilmington field have been remarkable responsive to the energies of steam. The injection of steam for short periods of time may be classified as one of the best methods known for oil stimulation. Under waterflood, results of the steam stimulation of wells by the cyclic steam-injection method have been reviewed against the frequency of well loss to the several operators producing the field. Because of the increasing water cuts associated with the waterflood mechanism and because of the risk of casing damage and well loss in existing wells not primarily equipped for periodic applications with high temperatures, this method stimulation is being viewed more critically than ever before. A measure of the response in oil-production performance that might be expected under waterflood operations resulting from steam stimulation is discussed. The costs of well-engineered steaming coupled with the costs normally associated with the recovery of oil indicate that minimum tolerance for the cost of well failure and repair should be controllable at no greater than the cost of the steam project itself.

Key concepts: Steam injection, Well stimulation, Petroleum engineering, Workover, Casing, Oil field, Petroleum, Steaming

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Steam stimulation Tidelands operations, Wilmington oil field — Research Paper | ScholarLens