1968•Prod. Mon.; (United States)Requires access

Practical considerations in steamflooding

S.M. Farouq Ali

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

During the last few years, continuous or intermittent injection of steam into a reservoir has established itself as a technically feasible and often profitable oil recovery method. On the basis of very limited data it would seem that the overall ratio of barrels of oil recovered to the barrels of water injected as steam may range from 0.3 to 0.6. Among the unknowns involved in a steam-flood, is the value of the steam-flood residual oil saturation. This must be known, or estimated by other means. Another important quantity which is not known is sweep efficiency. Gravity segregation may lead to the passage of steam through the upper portion of the reservoir. This may lead to poor conformance in a high permeability, isotropic formation. Presence of high permeability streaks can lead to the failure of the project, since steam break-through would occur very early in the life of the project, and thereafter most of the injected heat energy would go unused. (18 refs.)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During the last few years, continuous or intermittent injection of steam into a reservoir has established itself as a technically feasible and often profitable oil recovery method. On the basis of very limited data it would seem that the overall ratio of barrels of oil recovered to the barrels of water injected as steam may range from 0.3 to 0.6. Among the unknowns involved in a steam-flood, is the value of the steam-flood residual oil saturation. This must be known, or estimated by other means. Another important quantity which is not known is sweep efficiency. Gravity segregation may lead to the passage of steam through the upper portion of the reservoir. This may lead to poor conformance in a high permeability, isotropic formation. Presence of high permeability streaks can lead to the failure of the project, since steam break-through would occur very early in the life of the project, and thereafter most of the injected heat energy would go unused. (18 refs.)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During the last few years, continuous or intermittent injection of steam into a reservoir has established itself as a technically feasible and often profitable oil recovery method. On the basis of very limited data it would seem that the overall ratio of barrels of oil recovered to the barrels of water injected as steam may range from 0.3 to 0.6. Among the unknowns involved in a steam-flood, is the value of the steam-flood residual oil saturation. This must be known, or estimated by other means. Another important quantity which is not known is sweep efficiency. Gravity segregation may lead to the passage of steam through the upper portion of the reservoir. This may lead to poor conformance in a high permeability, isotropic formation. Presence of high permeability streaks can lead to the failure of the project, since steam break-through would occur very early in the life of the project, and thereafter most of the injected heat energy would go unused. (18 refs.)

Key concepts: Petroleum engineering, Steam injection, Environmental science, Well stimulation, Flood myth, Permeability (electromagnetism), Residual oil, Reservoir engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Practical considerations in steamflooding — Research Paper | ScholarLens