2011PubMedRequires access

[Clinical validity of renal function markers including serum cystatin C on chronic kidney disease classification].

Yoshitake Suzuki, Kazuyuki Matsushita, Toshihiko Yoshida, Yuji Sawabe, Fumio Nomura

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In this study, clinical utility of various renal function markers (Cystatin C, Creatinine, beta2-microglobulin, Urea nitrogen) including serum Cystatin C was evaluated by the latex turbidimetric immunoassay based on the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage classification. Serum creatinine was most correlated with estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), followed by serum Cystatin C. However, the level of serum Cystatin C increased significantly earlier than other renal function markers in the group of mild renal dysfunction based on the CKD stage classification. Cystatin C also had the most distinctive ability of the renal dysfunction by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and distinction characteristic analysis. Thus, it is useful to measure serum Cystatin C and serum creatinine at the same time to improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, eGFR was 6% higher than Ccr on stage III-V, though Ccr was 30% higher than eGFR on stage I-II by CKD stage classifications. Since eGFR and Ccr showed different results in early and severe CKD groups, it was suggested that Ccr and eGFR need to be evaluated as different renal function markers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, clinical utility of various renal function markers (Cystatin C, Creatinine, beta2-microglobulin, Urea nitrogen) including serum Cystatin C was evaluated by the latex turbidimetric immunoassay based on the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage classification. Serum creatinine was most correlated with estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), followed by serum Cystatin C. However, the level of serum Cystatin C increased significantly earlier than other renal function markers in the group of mild renal dysfunction based on the CKD stage classification. Cystatin C also had the most distinctive ability of the renal dysfunction by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and distinction characteristic analysis. Thus, it is useful to measure serum Cystatin C and serum creatinine at the same time to improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, eGFR was 6% higher than Ccr on stage III-V, though Ccr was 30% higher than eGFR on stage I-II by CKD stage classifications. Since eGFR and Ccr showed different results in early and severe CKD groups, it was suggested that Ccr and eGFR need to be evaluated as different renal function markers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, clinical utility of various renal function markers (Cystatin C, Creatinine, beta2-microglobulin, Urea nitrogen) including serum Cystatin C was evaluated by the latex turbidimetric immunoassay based on the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage classification. Serum creatinine was most correlated with estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), followed by serum Cystatin C. However, the level of serum Cystatin C increased significantly earlier than other renal function markers in the group of mild renal dysfunction based on the CKD stage classification. Cystatin C also had the most distinctive ability of the renal dysfunction by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and distinction characteristic analysis. Thus, it is useful to measure serum Cystatin C and serum creatinine at the same time to improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, eGFR was 6% higher than Ccr on stage III-V, though Ccr was 30% higher than eGFR on stage I-II by CKD stage classifications. Since eGFR and Ccr showed different results in early and severe CKD groups, it was suggested that Ccr and eGFR need to be evaluated as different renal function markers.

Key concepts: Cystatin C, Renal function, Creatinine, Kidney disease, Medicine, Internal medicine, Cystatin, Stage (stratigraphy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Clinical validity of renal function markers including serum cystatin C on chronic kidney disease classification]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens