2011대한기계학회 춘추학술대회Requires access

Comparisons of upwind numerical scheme for a hyperbolic two-fluid model

Moon-Sun Chung, Youn-Gyu Jung, Sung‐Jae Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A lot of upwind scheme has been developed for simulating high speed, single-phase flows and some of them prove to be very successful. However, all of these numerical schemes cannot be applied for two-phase flow problems due to their complexity relating the interfacial phenomena between two phases of fluid. For this reason, sometimes we need to find an optimal numerical scheme in order to adopt a prominent upwind scheme to the hyperbolic two-fluid model for two-phase flows. Before choosing an upwind numerical scheme, we need to compare some candidates by solving benchmark problems. In this study, we compare the Flux Vector Splitting (FVS) scheme with the Harten, Lax and van Leer (HLL) scheme for a hyperbolic two-fluid model for 1D. equation system and analyze their advantage and disadvantage by calculating the two-phase shock-tube problem.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A lot of upwind scheme has been developed for simulating high speed, single-phase flows and some of them prove to be very successful. However, all of these numerical schemes cannot be applied for two-phase flow problems due to their complexity relating the interfacial phenomena between two phases of fluid. For this reason, sometimes we need to find an optimal numerical scheme in order to adopt a prominent upwind scheme to the hyperbolic two-fluid model for two-phase flows. Before choosing an upwind numerical scheme, we need to compare some candidates by solving benchmark problems. In this study, we compare the Flux Vector Splitting (FVS) scheme with the Harten, Lax and van Leer (HLL) scheme for a hyperbolic two-fluid model for 1D. equation system and analyze their advantage and disadvantage by calculating the two-phase shock-tube problem.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A lot of upwind scheme has been developed for simulating high speed, single-phase flows and some of them prove to be very successful. However, all of these numerical schemes cannot be applied for two-phase flow problems due to their complexity relating the interfacial phenomena between two phases of fluid. For this reason, sometimes we need to find an optimal numerical scheme in order to adopt a prominent upwind scheme to the hyperbolic two-fluid model for two-phase flows. Before choosing an upwind numerical scheme, we need to compare some candidates by solving benchmark problems. In this study, we compare the Flux Vector Splitting (FVS) scheme with the Harten, Lax and van Leer (HLL) scheme for a hyperbolic two-fluid model for 1D. equation system and analyze their advantage and disadvantage by calculating the two-phase shock-tube problem.

Key concepts: Upwind scheme, Mathematics, Applied mathematics, Flow (mathematics), Scheme (mathematics), Benchmark (surveying), Shock (circulatory), Total variation diminishing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparisons of upwind numerical scheme for a hyperbolic two-fluid model — Research Paper | ScholarLens