2013AIP conference proceedingsRequires access

Comparative study of upwind schemes for transonic and supersonic internal flows

M. L. Niculescu, Sterian Dănăilă

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

A study of some popular upwind schemes applied to transonic internal flows using some well-known test cases is done in this paper. We focused on upwind schemes because the central space discretizations have symmetry with respect to a change in sign; therefore, the physical propagation of perturbations along characteristics, typical of hyperbolic equations is not considered in the definition of numerical model. In contrast to the central space discretizations, the upwind schemes whose origin may be due to Courant et al. [1] are directed towards the introduction of the physical properties of the flow equations into the discretized formulation that has leads to upwinding techniques such as flux vector splitting and flux difference splitting. In order to test the accuracy, robustness and efficiency of some popular upwind methods (van Leer scheme, Roe scheme and Liou's AUSM+ scheme); we used some well-known test cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study of some popular upwind schemes applied to transonic internal flows using some well-known test cases is done in this paper. We focused on upwind schemes because the central space discretizations have symmetry with respect to a change in sign; therefore, the physical propagation of perturbations along characteristics, typical of hyperbolic equations is not considered in the definition of numerical model. In contrast to the central space discretizations, the upwind schemes whose origin may be due to Courant et al. [1] are directed towards the introduction of the physical properties of the flow equations into the discretized formulation that has leads to upwinding techniques such as flux vector splitting and flux difference splitting. In order to test the accuracy, robustness and efficiency of some popular upwind methods (van Leer scheme, Roe scheme and Liou's AUSM+ scheme); we used some well-known test cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study of some popular upwind schemes applied to transonic internal flows using some well-known test cases is done in this paper. We focused on upwind schemes because the central space discretizations have symmetry with respect to a change in sign; therefore, the physical propagation of perturbations along characteristics, typical of hyperbolic equations is not considered in the definition of numerical model. In contrast to the central space discretizations, the upwind schemes whose origin may be due to Courant et al. [1] are directed towards the introduction of the physical properties of the flow equations into the discretized formulation that has leads to upwinding techniques such as flux vector splitting and flux difference splitting. In order to test the accuracy, robustness and efficiency of some popular upwind methods (van Leer scheme, Roe scheme and Liou's AUSM+ scheme); we used some well-known test cases.

Key concepts: Upwind scheme, Transonic, Discretization, Mathematics, Applied mathematics, Robustness (evolution), Roe solver, Supersonic speed

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of upwind schemes for transonic and supersonic internal flows — Research Paper | ScholarLens