1984University of New South Wales law journalRequires access

The Admissibility of Survey Evidence in Intellectual Property Cases

James Farmer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The admissibility of survey evidence, in the context of issues arising under the Trade Practices Act 1974, was raised in two cases heard before Mr Justice Franki in the Federal Court. In the result, Franki J. held that the applicant had not made out a prima facie case, such as would justify the granting of interlocutory relief.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The admissibility of survey evidence, in the context of issues arising under the Trade Practices Act 1974, was raised in two cases heard before Mr Justice Franki in the Federal Court. In the result, Franki J. held that the applicant had not made out a prima facie case, such as would justify the granting of interlocutory relief.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The admissibility of survey evidence, in the context of issues arising under the Trade Practices Act 1974, was raised in two cases heard before Mr Justice Franki in the Federal Court. In the result, Franki J. held that the applicant had not made out a prima facie case, such as would justify the granting of interlocutory relief.

Key concepts: Interlocutory, Prima facie, Context (archaeology), Law, Project commissioning, Economic Justice, Publishing, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Admissibility of Survey Evidence in Intellectual Property Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens