1975•Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The)Requires access

Heterosis and Combining Ability in Pearl Millet

Chandra Shakher Tyagi, R. S. Paroda, N. D. Arora, Krishna Pratap Singh

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Combining ability studies, using Method 2 and Model I (P's and F1’s) and Method 4, Model I (only F1’s), were carried out for grain yield and its components in a 10 × 10 diallel set excluding reciprocals in pearl-millet. The estimates of both the combining ability variances (σ2 gca and σ2 sca) were highly significant for all the six characters studied. Boh the methods gave similar estimates of general combining ability and specific combining ability effects. The magnitude of GCA: SCA ratio in the F1 and F2 generations was low in Method 2 and high in Method 4. High GCA: SCA ratio revealed preponderance of additive genetic variance for all the grain characters studied. Significant association between array means and general combining ability effects suggested that the former could be used effectively in the selection of good combiners. Inbreds H-19 and H-403 showed better combining ability for most of the six characters studied. H-80 was particularly good combiner for characters like earliness and ear diameter. The best crosses for grain yield were H-19 × H-403, H-19 × H-30, H-19 × H-126 and H-80 × H-224. Among these, the first two crosses involved good general combining parents. H-19 × H-403 also appeared to be a promising cross for characters like resistance to downy mildew, ear number, ear length, and earliness and thus, appeared to be the best among all. Its exploitation in varietal breeding programme, using bi-parental approach to accumulate more of additive genetic variance is, therefore, advocated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Combining ability studies, using Method 2 and Model I (P's and F1’s) and Method 4, Model I (only F1’s), were carried out for grain yield and its components in a 10 × 10 diallel set excluding reciprocals in pearl-millet. The estimates of both the combining ability variances (σ2 gca and σ2 sca) were highly significant for all the six characters studied. Boh the methods gave similar estimates of general combining ability and specific combining ability effects. The magnitude of GCA: SCA ratio in the F1 and F2 generations was low in Method 2 and high in Method 4. High GCA: SCA ratio revealed preponderance of additive genetic variance for all the grain characters studied. Significant association between array means and general combining ability effects suggested that the former could be used effectively in the selection of good combiners. Inbreds H-19 and H-403 showed better combining ability for most of the six characters studied. H-80 was particularly good combiner for characters like earliness and ear diameter. The best crosses for grain yield were H-19 × H-403, H-19 × H-30, H-19 × H-126 and H-80 × H-224. Among these, the first two crosses involved good general combining parents. H-19 × H-403 also appeared to be a promising cross for characters like resistance to downy mildew, ear number, ear length, and earliness and thus, appeared to be the best among all. Its exploitation in varietal breeding programme, using bi-parental approach to accumulate more of additive genetic variance is, therefore, advocated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Combining ability studies, using Method 2 and Model I (P's and F1’s) and Method 4, Model I (only F1’s), were carried out for grain yield and its components in a 10 × 10 diallel set excluding reciprocals in pearl-millet. The estimates of both the combining ability variances (σ2 gca and σ2 sca) were highly significant for all the six characters studied. Boh the methods gave similar estimates of general combining ability and specific combining ability effects. The magnitude of GCA: SCA ratio in the F1 and F2 generations was low in Method 2 and high in Method 4. High GCA: SCA ratio revealed preponderance of additive genetic variance for all the grain characters studied. Significant association between array means and general combining ability effects suggested that the former could be used effectively in the selection of good combiners. Inbreds H-19 and H-403 showed better combining ability for most of the six characters studied. H-80 was particularly good combiner for characters like earliness and ear diameter. The best crosses for grain yield were H-19 × H-403, H-19 × H-30, H-19 × H-126 and H-80 × H-224. Among these, the first two crosses involved good general combining parents. H-19 × H-403 also appeared to be a promising cross for characters like resistance to downy mildew, ear number, ear length, and earliness and thus, appeared to be the best among all. Its exploitation in varietal breeding programme, using bi-parental approach to accumulate more of additive genetic variance is, therefore, advocated.

Key concepts: Diallel cross, Downy mildew, Heterosis, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Grain yield, Forensic science, Horticulture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Heterosis and Combining Ability in Pearl Millet — Research Paper | ScholarLens