2001•Contributions to economicsRequires access

Monopolistic and Oligopolistic Imperfect Demand Competition

Jochen Schumann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The traditional literature on imperfect competition concentrates on suppliers competing aboutdemanders who have preferences for certain suppliers. One could say that, by the preferences of demanders, every supplier may act like a monopolist within certain limits - the limits being dueto the fact that the products offered by suppliers are, in demanders’ opinion, narrow substitutes. Every supplier sells one specific variant of the product, which is determined by demanders’ preferences. There is, thus, product differentiation on the supply side of the market, and there are, on the rule, different profit maximizing prices set by suppliers for the specific but similar variants of the product. This description applies to the models of many suppliers’“monopolistic competition” by Chamberlin (dy1965), of“imperfectcompetition” by Robinson (1933) and of“polypolistic competition” by Gutenberg (1979) as well as to models of a few suppliers’ heterogenous oligopolistic competitionin the tradition of Launhardt (1885) and Hotelling (1929). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The traditional literature on imperfect competition concentrates on suppliers competing aboutdemanders who have preferences for certain suppliers. One could say that, by the preferences of demanders, every supplier may act like a monopolist within certain limits - the limits being dueto the fact that the products offered by suppliers are, in demanders’ opinion, narrow substitutes. Every supplier sells one specific variant of the product, which is determined by demanders’ preferences. There is, thus, product differentiation on the supply side of the market, and there are, on the rule, different profit maximizing prices set by suppliers for the specific but similar variants of the product. This description applies to the models of many suppliers’“monopolistic competition” by Chamberlin (dy1965), of“imperfectcompetition” by Robinson (1933) and of“polypolistic competition” by Gutenberg (1979) as well as to models of a few suppliers’ heterogenous oligopolistic competitionin the tradition of Launhardt (1885) and Hotelling (1929). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The traditional literature on imperfect competition concentrates on suppliers competing aboutdemanders who have preferences for certain suppliers. One could say that, by the preferences of demanders, every supplier may act like a monopolist within certain limits - the limits being dueto the fact that the products offered by suppliers are, in demanders’ opinion, narrow substitutes. Every supplier sells one specific variant of the product, which is determined by demanders’ preferences. There is, thus, product differentiation on the supply side of the market, and there are, on the rule, different profit maximizing prices set by suppliers for the specific but similar variants of the product. This description applies to the models of many suppliers’“monopolistic competition” by Chamberlin (dy1965), of“imperfectcompetition” by Robinson (1933) and of“polypolistic competition” by Gutenberg (1979) as well as to models of a few suppliers’ heterogenous oligopolistic competitionin the tradition of Launhardt (1885) and Hotelling (1929). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Monopolistic competition, Oligopoly, Imperfect competition, Microeconomics, Product differentiation, Economics, Competition (biology), Profit (economics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monopolistic and Oligopolistic Imperfect Demand Competition — Research Paper | ScholarLens