2006Advances in transportation studiesRequires access

Safety evaluation of right turn followed by U-turn at a signalized intersection as an alternative to direct left turn from driveways

Fatih Pirinccioglu, John Jenn-Yenn Lu, Juan Pernia

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Direct left turns (DLT) from the driveways have been a concern for transportation engineers as a major source of operational and safety problems. In the past, several studies have been conducted addressing the safety and operational problems related to DLT movements, and alternatives to direct left turn from driveways. This paper evaluated the safety effects of right turns followed by U-turns at signalized intersections (RTUT) as an alternative to direct left turns from driveways and side streets. The safety evaluation was accomplished by comparison of traffic conflicts. Nine types of conflicts were selected for this study. Five of the conflicts were related to RTUT movements, while the rest of them were related to DLT movements. Data were collected with the help of video recording equipment at a total of eight sites for over 300 hours. Two types of conflict rates, conflicts per hour and conflicts per thousand involved vehicles were used for safety comparison of the two left turning alternatives. DLT movements generated averagely 6.7 conflicts per hour, while RTUT movements generated 2.4 conflicts per hour. On the other hand, average number of conflicts per thousand vehicles involved for DLT and RTUT movements were 40.6 and 26.2 respectively. Severity of conflicts was analyzed by use of Risk of Collision (ROC) scores. In general, when both DLT and RTUT are compared, based on the results of this study, RTUT movements reduce the number of conflicts, and the overall severity of RTUT related conflicts are significantly lower than that of DLT related conflicts. (A)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Direct left turns (DLT) from the driveways have been a concern for transportation engineers as a major source of operational and safety problems. In the past, several studies have been conducted addressing the safety and operational problems related to DLT movements, and alternatives to direct left turn from driveways. This paper evaluated the safety effects of right turns followed by U-turns at signalized intersections (RTUT) as an alternative to direct left turns from driveways and side streets. The safety evaluation was accomplished by comparison of traffic conflicts. Nine types of conflicts were selected for this study. Five of the conflicts were related to RTUT movements, while the rest of them were related to DLT movements. Data were collected with the help of video recording equipment at a total of eight sites for over 300 hours. Two types of conflict rates, conflicts per hour and conflicts per thousand involved vehicles were used for safety comparison of the two left turning alternatives. DLT movements generated averagely 6.7 conflicts per hour, while RTUT movements generated 2.4 conflicts per hour. On the other hand, average number of conflicts per thousand vehicles involved for DLT and RTUT movements were 40.6 and 26.2 respectively. Severity of conflicts was analyzed by use of Risk of Collision (ROC) scores. In general, when both DLT and RTUT are compared, based on the results of this study, RTUT movements reduce the number of conflicts, and the overall severity of RTUT related conflicts are significantly lower than that of DLT related conflicts. (A)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Direct left turns (DLT) from the driveways have been a concern for transportation engineers as a major source of operational and safety problems. In the past, several studies have been conducted addressing the safety and operational problems related to DLT movements, and alternatives to direct left turn from driveways. This paper evaluated the safety effects of right turns followed by U-turns at signalized intersections (RTUT) as an alternative to direct left turns from driveways and side streets. The safety evaluation was accomplished by comparison of traffic conflicts. Nine types of conflicts were selected for this study. Five of the conflicts were related to RTUT movements, while the rest of them were related to DLT movements. Data were collected with the help of video recording equipment at a total of eight sites for over 300 hours. Two types of conflict rates, conflicts per hour and conflicts per thousand involved vehicles were used for safety comparison of the two left turning alternatives. DLT movements generated averagely 6.7 conflicts per hour, while RTUT movements generated 2.4 conflicts per hour. On the other hand, average number of conflicts per thousand vehicles involved for DLT and RTUT movements were 40.6 and 26.2 respectively. Severity of conflicts was analyzed by use of Risk of Collision (ROC) scores. In general, when both DLT and RTUT are compared, based on the results of this study, RTUT movements reduce the number of conflicts, and the overall severity of RTUT related conflicts are significantly lower than that of DLT related conflicts. (A)

Key concepts: Intersection (aeronautics), Transport engineering, Traffic conflict, Poison control, Human factors and ergonomics, Engineering, Environmental health, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety evaluation of right turn followed by U-turn at a signalized intersection as an alternative to direct left turn from driveways — Research Paper | ScholarLens