2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Safety Evaluation of Right Turns Followed by U-Turns at Signalized Intersections (6 or More lanes) as an Alternative to Direct Left Turns - Conflict Analysis

Jian Lü, Fatih Pirinccioglu, Juan Pernia

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

This report is one of two reports of the project that evaluated the safety and operational impact of a right turn followed by a U-turn (RTUT) at a signalized intersection as an alternative to a direct left turn (DLT) from driveways and side streets. This report evaluated the safety of both alternatives by comparison of traffic conflicts. Nine types of conflicts were selected for this study. Five of the conflicts were related to RTUT movements, while the rest of them were related to DLT movements. Data were collected with the help of video recording equipment at a total of eight sites for over 300 hours. Descriptive analysis and conflict rate analysis were conducted. Two types of conflict rates, conflicts per hour and conflicts per thousand involved vehicles, were used for safety comparison of the two left turning alternatives. DLT movements generated on average 6.7 conflicts per hour, while RTUT movements generated 2.4 conflicts per hour. On the other hand, the average number of conflicts per thousand vehicles involved for DLT and RTUT movements were 40.6 and 26.2, respectively. Severity of conflicts was analyzed by Risk of Collision (ROC) score. In general, when both DLT and RTUT are compared, based on the results of this study, RTUT movements reduce the number of conflicts, and the overall severity of RTUT related conflicts are significantly lower than that of DLT related conflicts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report is one of two reports of the project that evaluated the safety and operational impact of a right turn followed by a U-turn (RTUT) at a signalized intersection as an alternative to a direct left turn (DLT) from driveways and side streets. This report evaluated the safety of both alternatives by comparison of traffic conflicts. Nine types of conflicts were selected for this study. Five of the conflicts were related to RTUT movements, while the rest of them were related to DLT movements. Data were collected with the help of video recording equipment at a total of eight sites for over 300 hours. Descriptive analysis and conflict rate analysis were conducted. Two types of conflict rates, conflicts per hour and conflicts per thousand involved vehicles, were used for safety comparison of the two left turning alternatives. DLT movements generated on average 6.7 conflicts per hour, while RTUT movements generated 2.4 conflicts per hour. On the other hand, the average number of conflicts per thousand vehicles involved for DLT and RTUT movements were 40.6 and 26.2, respectively. Severity of conflicts was analyzed by Risk of Collision (ROC) score. In general, when both DLT and RTUT are compared, based on the results of this study, RTUT movements reduce the number of conflicts, and the overall severity of RTUT related conflicts are significantly lower than that of DLT related conflicts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report is one of two reports of the project that evaluated the safety and operational impact of a right turn followed by a U-turn (RTUT) at a signalized intersection as an alternative to a direct left turn (DLT) from driveways and side streets. This report evaluated the safety of both alternatives by comparison of traffic conflicts. Nine types of conflicts were selected for this study. Five of the conflicts were related to RTUT movements, while the rest of them were related to DLT movements. Data were collected with the help of video recording equipment at a total of eight sites for over 300 hours. Descriptive analysis and conflict rate analysis were conducted. Two types of conflict rates, conflicts per hour and conflicts per thousand involved vehicles, were used for safety comparison of the two left turning alternatives. DLT movements generated on average 6.7 conflicts per hour, while RTUT movements generated 2.4 conflicts per hour. On the other hand, the average number of conflicts per thousand vehicles involved for DLT and RTUT movements were 40.6 and 26.2, respectively. Severity of conflicts was analyzed by Risk of Collision (ROC) score. In general, when both DLT and RTUT are compared, based on the results of this study, RTUT movements reduce the number of conflicts, and the overall severity of RTUT related conflicts are significantly lower than that of DLT related conflicts.

Key concepts: Intersection (aeronautics), Traffic conflict, Transport engineering, Psychology, Operations management, Engineering, Traffic congestion, Floating car data

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety Evaluation of Right Turns Followed by U-Turns at Signalized Intersections (6 or More lanes) as an Alternative to Direct Left Turns - Conflict Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens