2000Cold Spring Harbor Monograph ArchiveRequires access

19 Cellular Internal Ribosome Entry Site Elements and the Use of cDNA Microarrays in Their Investigation

Mark S. Carter, Kenneth Kuhn, Peter Sarnow

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

The discovery that picornaviral RNA genomes are translated by an internal ribosome entry mechanism (see Chapter 4) raised the question whether host cell mRNAs could use this initiation mechanism as well. This idea was supported by the finding that internal initiation could operate on viral internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) both in cultured cells (Pelletier and Sonenberg 1988; Jang et al. 1989) and in cell-free systems (Jang et al. 1988; Pelletier and Sonenberg 1989) in the absence of any viral factors, suggesting that the eukaryotic translation apparatus can perform internal initiation. As discussed in Chapter 4, IRES elements can promote translation in the absence of a functional 5′ cap-binding protein complex eIF4F, composed of factors eIF4E, eIF4A, and eIF4G. Thus, it was not too surprising when the first cellular IRES-containing mRNA, encoding the immunoglobulin binding protein BiP (Ting and Lee 1988), was identified by its ability to be translated in poliovirus-infected cells when overall translation of host cell mRNAs was inhibited as a result of eIF4G degradation (Sarnow 1989). Translation assays with dicistronic mRNAs that contained the 5′ noncoding region (5′NCR) of BiP inserted between two reporter cistrons revealed that the BiP 5′NCR could mediate translation of the second cistron without a requirement for ribosomes to traverse the first cistron (Macejak and Sarnow 1991). This result strongly suggested that the BiP 5′NCR functions as an IRES which can bind ribosomes directly and mediate translation of open reading frames, located downstream. The identification of further cellular mRNAs with IRES elements has...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The discovery that picornaviral RNA genomes are translated by an internal ribosome entry mechanism (see Chapter 4) raised the question whether host cell mRNAs could use this initiation mechanism as well. This idea was supported by the finding that internal initiation could operate on viral internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) both in cultured cells (Pelletier and Sonenberg 1988; Jang et al. 1989) and in cell-free systems (Jang et al. 1988; Pelletier and Sonenberg 1989) in the absence of any viral factors, suggesting that the eukaryotic translation apparatus can perform internal initiation. As discussed in Chapter 4, IRES elements can promote translation in the absence of a functional 5′ cap-binding protein complex eIF4F, composed of factors eIF4E, eIF4A, and eIF4G. Thus, it was not too surprising when the first cellular IRES-containing mRNA, encoding the immunoglobulin binding protein BiP (Ting and Lee 1988), was identified by its ability to be translated in poliovirus-infected cells when overall translation of host cell mRNAs was inhibited as a result of eIF4G degradation (Sarnow 1989). Translation assays with dicistronic mRNAs that contained the 5′ noncoding region (5′NCR) of BiP inserted between two reporter cistrons revealed that the BiP 5′NCR could mediate translation of the second cistron without a requirement for ribosomes to traverse the first cistron (Macejak and Sarnow 1991). This result strongly suggested that the BiP 5′NCR functions as an IRES which can bind ribosomes directly and mediate translation of open reading frames, located downstream. The identification of further cellular mRNAs with IRES elements has...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The discovery that picornaviral RNA genomes are translated by an internal ribosome entry mechanism (see Chapter 4) raised the question whether host cell mRNAs could use this initiation mechanism as well. This idea was supported by the finding that internal initiation could operate on viral internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) both in cultured cells (Pelletier and Sonenberg 1988; Jang et al. 1989) and in cell-free systems (Jang et al. 1988; Pelletier and Sonenberg 1989) in the absence of any viral factors, suggesting that the eukaryotic translation apparatus can perform internal initiation. As discussed in Chapter 4, IRES elements can promote translation in the absence of a functional 5′ cap-binding protein complex eIF4F, composed of factors eIF4E, eIF4A, and eIF4G. Thus, it was not too surprising when the first cellular IRES-containing mRNA, encoding the immunoglobulin binding protein BiP (Ting and Lee 1988), was identified by its ability to be translated in poliovirus-infected cells when overall translation of host cell mRNAs was inhibited as a result of eIF4G degradation (Sarnow 1989). Translation assays with dicistronic mRNAs that contained the 5′ noncoding region (5′NCR) of BiP inserted between two reporter cistrons revealed that the BiP 5′NCR could mediate translation of the second cistron without a requirement for ribosomes to traverse the first cistron (Macejak and Sarnow 1991). This result strongly suggested that the BiP 5′NCR functions as an IRES which can bind ribosomes directly and mediate translation of open reading frames, located downstream. The identification of further cellular mRNAs with IRES elements has...

Key concepts: Internal ribosome entry site, EIF4G, Cistron, EIF4E, Biology, Eukaryotic initiation factor, Eukaryotic translation, Translation (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
19 Cellular Internal Ribosome Entry Site Elements and the Use of cDNA Microarrays in Their Investigation — Research Paper | ScholarLens