2014Pakistan Journal of OphthalmologyOpen access

Accuracy of IOP Measured By Non-Contact (Air - Puff) Tonometer Compared with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer

Javied Ahmad, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Muhammad Naeem, Tariq Mahmood Arain, Zaheeruddin A. Qazi

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the frequency of accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by non-contact (air puff) tonometer compared with Goldmann applanation tonometer.Material and Methods: This comparative study was done from April 2011 to September 2011, 286 patients between 10 to 72 years of age, both male and females coming to eye OPD for refraction and ocular examination included. Selected patients were explained and after informed consent; intraocular pressure was taken by consultant Ophthalmologist with Goldmann applanation tonometer (Haag – streit AT900) and Air puff tonometer (Keeler PT100) between 8 am to 1 pm.Results: Air puff tonometer had an overall accuracy of 49.70% to measure intraocular pressure within ± 2 mm Hg difference compared with Goldmann applanation tonometer. Air puff tonometer is more accurate at low pressure range, 54.40% at 10 – 20 mm Hg and accuracy decreases at higher pressure range, 20% at 51 – 60 mm Hg. At all ranges of intraocular pressures Air puff tonometer measured higher (mean 2.87 mm Hg) values than Goldmann applanation tonometer.Conclusion: Airpuff tonometer is quick, a non-contact method to measure intraocular pressure and is useful for screening purposes but the measurements should be confirmed with Goldmann applanation tonometer for accurate labelling of intraocular pressure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: To determine the frequency of accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by non-contact (air puff) tonometer compared with Goldmann applanation tonometer.Material and Methods: This comparative study was done from April 2011 to September 2011, 286 patients between 10 to 72 years of age, both male and females coming to eye OPD for refraction and ocular examination included. Selected patients were explained and after informed consent; intraocular pressure was taken by consultant Ophthalmologist with Goldmann applanation tonometer (Haag – streit AT900) and Air puff tonometer (Keeler PT100) between 8 am to 1 pm.Results: Air puff tonometer had an overall accuracy of 49.70% to measure intraocular pressure within ± 2 mm Hg difference compared with Goldmann applanation tonometer. Air puff tonometer is more accurate at low pressure range, 54.40% at 10 – 20 mm Hg and accuracy decreases at higher pressure range, 20% at 51 – 60 mm Hg. At all ranges of intraocular pressures Air puff tonometer measured higher (mean 2.87 mm Hg) values than Goldmann applanation tonometer.Conclusion: Airpuff tonometer is quick, a non-contact method to measure intraocular pressure and is useful for screening purposes but the measurements should be confirmed with Goldmann applanation tonometer for accurate labelling of intraocular pressure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: To determine the frequency of accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by non-contact (air puff) tonometer compared with Goldmann applanation tonometer.Material and Methods: This comparative study was done from April 2011 to September 2011, 286 patients between 10 to 72 years of age, both male and females coming to eye OPD for refraction and ocular examination included. Selected patients were explained and after informed consent; intraocular pressure was taken by consultant Ophthalmologist with Goldmann applanation tonometer (Haag – streit AT900) and Air puff tonometer (Keeler PT100) between 8 am to 1 pm.Results: Air puff tonometer had an overall accuracy of 49.70% to measure intraocular pressure within ± 2 mm Hg difference compared with Goldmann applanation tonometer. Air puff tonometer is more accurate at low pressure range, 54.40% at 10 – 20 mm Hg and accuracy decreases at higher pressure range, 20% at 51 – 60 mm Hg. At all ranges of intraocular pressures Air puff tonometer measured higher (mean 2.87 mm Hg) values than Goldmann applanation tonometer.Conclusion: Airpuff tonometer is quick, a non-contact method to measure intraocular pressure and is useful for screening purposes but the measurements should be confirmed with Goldmann applanation tonometer for accurate labelling of intraocular pressure.

Key concepts: Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Intraocular pressure, Ophthalmology, Applanation tonometry, Medicine, Optometry, Blood pressure, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Accuracy of IOP Measured By Non-Contact (Air - Puff) Tonometer Compared with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer — Research Paper | ScholarLens