2021Journal of Dermatological TreatmentRequires access

Liposomal azelaic acid 20% cream vs hydroquinone 4% cream as adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in melasma: a comparative study

E.M. Akl

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Melasma negatively impacts patient's quality of life (QoL). Although hydroquinone 4% is the most prescribed treatment, several side effects had been reported. The traditionally used azelaic acid 20% has poor tolerability and low skin absorption rate. AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% as an adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty females suffering from melasma were divided into two equal groups. The first group used a liposomal form of azelaic acid 20%, and the second group used hydroquinone 4%. Oral tranexamic acid 250 mg was taken by both groups as a single oral daily dose. Melasma severity and the patient's QoL were assessed. RESULTS: A significant improvement of melasma was detected in females who used the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% than those who used hydroquinone 4%. This was associated with a significant positive effect on their QoL. Furthermore, the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% was more significantly tolerable than hydroquinone 4%. CONCLUSION: The use of the liposomal form of azelaic acid provides an effective and well-tolerated addition to the treatment of melasma.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Melasma negatively impacts patient's quality of life (QoL). Although hydroquinone 4% is the most prescribed treatment, several side effects had been reported. The traditionally used azelaic acid 20% has poor tolerability and low skin absorption rate. AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% as an adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty females suffering from melasma were divided into two equal groups. The first group used a liposomal form of azelaic acid 20%, and the second group used hydroquinone 4%. Oral tranexamic acid 250 mg was taken by both groups as a single oral daily dose. Melasma severity and the patient's QoL were assessed. RESULTS: A significant improvement of melasma was detected in females who used the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% than those who used hydroquinone 4%. This was associated with a significant positive effect on their QoL. Furthermore, the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% was more significantly tolerable than hydroquinone 4%. CONCLUSION: The use of the liposomal form of azelaic acid provides an effective and well-tolerated addition to the treatment of melasma.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Melasma negatively impacts patient's quality of life (QoL). Although hydroquinone 4% is the most prescribed treatment, several side effects had been reported. The traditionally used azelaic acid 20% has poor tolerability and low skin absorption rate. AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% as an adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty females suffering from melasma were divided into two equal groups. The first group used a liposomal form of azelaic acid 20%, and the second group used hydroquinone 4%. Oral tranexamic acid 250 mg was taken by both groups as a single oral daily dose. Melasma severity and the patient's QoL were assessed. RESULTS: A significant improvement of melasma was detected in females who used the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% than those who used hydroquinone 4%. This was associated with a significant positive effect on their QoL. Furthermore, the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% was more significantly tolerable than hydroquinone 4%. CONCLUSION: The use of the liposomal form of azelaic acid provides an effective and well-tolerated addition to the treatment of melasma.

Key concepts: Melasma, Azelaic acid, Tolerability, Medicine, Tranexamic acid, Dermatology, Adjuvant, Hydroquinone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Liposomal azelaic acid 20% cream vs hydroquinone 4% cream as adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in melasma: a comparative study — Research Paper | ScholarLens