Grape Phylloxera Populations Adapted to Vitis berlandieri x V. riparia Rootstocks
L. Kocsis, Jeffrey Granett, Michael Andrew Walker, Hong Lin, A. D. Omer
Abstract
L. Kocsis, Jeffrey Granett, Michael Andrew Walker, Hong Lin, A. D. Omer
Abstract
Seven grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Fitch), colonies collected from populations on root or leaf galls on the Vitis berlandieri x V. riparia rootstocks SO4, 5BB, and 5C, one colony from the rootstock V. rupestris St. George, and one colony collected from V. vinifera Cabernet Sauvignon were compared in bioassays with excised roots. The colonies were collected in Hungary, Germany, and the United States. The colonies had differing survival, developmental and reproductive capacities when tested on Cabernet Sauvignon, SO4 and 5C in laboratory bioassays. The colonies collected from rootstocks utilized SO4 and 5C roots better than the V. vinifera -collected colony. The performance of the colonies on 5C and SO4 roots was better on callus and nodosities than on tuberosities. This level of utilization of the rootstock roots is likely a result of selection for individuals possessing such traits from a variable population in viticultural situations. Colonies arising from roots or leaves were similarly adapted in the root bioassays. RAPD DNA analysis suggests that the rootstock-collected phylloxera are genetically remote from the V. vinifera collected colony.
OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Seven grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Fitch), colonies collected from populations on root or leaf galls on the Vitis berlandieri x V. riparia rootstocks SO4, 5BB, and 5C, one colony from the rootstock V. rupestris St. George, and one colony collected from V. vinifera Cabernet Sauvignon were compared in bioassays with excised roots. The colonies were collected in Hungary, Germany, and the United States. The colonies had differing survival, developmental and reproductive capacities when tested on Cabernet Sauvignon, SO4 and 5C in laboratory bioassays. The colonies collected from rootstocks utilized SO4 and 5C roots better than the V. vinifera -collected colony. The performance of the colonies on 5C and SO4 roots was better on callus and nodosities than on tuberosities. This level of utilization of the rootstock roots is likely a result of selection for individuals possessing such traits from a variable population in viticultural situations. Colonies arising from roots or leaves were similarly adapted in the root bioassays. RAPD DNA analysis suggests that the rootstock-collected phylloxera are genetically remote from the V. vinifera collected colony.
Key concepts: Phylloxera, Rootstock, Biology, Botany, Horticulture, Population, Vitis vinifera, Bioassay