1985•Journal of Economic EntomologyRequires access

Grape Phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) Biotypes in California

Jeffrey Granett, Patricia Timper, Lloyd A. Lider

Open publisher page 70 citations

Abstract

Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira viiifoliae Fitch) obtained from Rutherford, Calif., appeared to overcome the resistance of the hybrid grape rootstock, Ganzin 1, in the field. These insects were reared in the laboratory and compared with phylloxera from another Napa Valley location in an excised root life-table experiment. The Rutherford phylloxera (type B) developed and laid eggs quicker and had a greater fecundity than the Napa phylloxera (type A), as indicated by life-history parameters of generation time, gross and net reproductive rates, and doubling time. On the highly resistant rootstock, St. George, a pure Vitis rupestris (Scheele) selection, the type-B phylloxera were also able to establish and reproduce better than type-A phylloxera. On the susceptible V. vinifera L. variety, Cabernet Sauvignon, both phylloxera types did equally well. These data indicate a potentially serious problem for California vineyards in coastal valleys where phylloxera are established.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira viiifoliae Fitch) obtained from Rutherford, Calif., appeared to overcome the resistance of the hybrid grape rootstock, Ganzin 1, in the field. These insects were reared in the laboratory and compared with phylloxera from another Napa Valley location in an excised root life-table experiment. The Rutherford phylloxera (type B) developed and laid eggs quicker and had a greater fecundity than the Napa phylloxera (type A), as indicated by life-history parameters of generation time, gross and net reproductive rates, and doubling time. On the highly resistant rootstock, St. George, a pure Vitis rupestris (Scheele) selection, the type-B phylloxera were also able to establish and reproduce better than type-A phylloxera. On the susceptible V. vinifera L. variety, Cabernet Sauvignon, both phylloxera types did equally well. These data indicate a potentially serious problem for California vineyards in coastal valleys where phylloxera are established.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 70 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira viiifoliae Fitch) obtained from Rutherford, Calif., appeared to overcome the resistance of the hybrid grape rootstock, Ganzin 1, in the field. These insects were reared in the laboratory and compared with phylloxera from another Napa Valley location in an excised root life-table experiment. The Rutherford phylloxera (type B) developed and laid eggs quicker and had a greater fecundity than the Napa phylloxera (type A), as indicated by life-history parameters of generation time, gross and net reproductive rates, and doubling time. On the highly resistant rootstock, St. George, a pure Vitis rupestris (Scheele) selection, the type-B phylloxera were also able to establish and reproduce better than type-A phylloxera. On the susceptible V. vinifera L. variety, Cabernet Sauvignon, both phylloxera types did equally well. These data indicate a potentially serious problem for California vineyards in coastal valleys where phylloxera are established.

Key concepts: Homoptera, Phylloxera, Biology, Library science, PEST analysis, Botany, Rootstock, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Grape Phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) Biotypes in California — Research Paper | ScholarLens