Activity of the Fluoroketolide, Solithromycin Tested against Bacterial Species Associated with Significant Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Other Gram-positive Organisms
Douglas J. Biedenbach, Mariana Castanheira, Rn Jones
Abstract
Douglas J. Biedenbach, Mariana Castanheira, Rn Jones
Abstract
Results: Against S. aureus (SA), SOL (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/>4 µg/mL) displayed similar activity to telithromycin (TEL; MIC 50/90 , ≤0.06/>8 µg/mL) and four-fold greater than erythromycin (ERY; MIC 50 , 0.5 µg/mL). SOL (MIC 50/90 , ≤0.03/>4 µg/mL) showed comparable activity to TEL against CoNS (78.2% S). Methicillin (M) R SA (40.2%) and CoNS (68.4%) displayed higher SOL MICs compared to MS strains. SOL was moderately active against enterococci (ENT; MIC 50/90 , 0.5/2 µg/mL), but was two-fold more potent than TEL (MIC 50/90 , 1/4 µg/mL). SOL exhibited greater potency against E. faecalis (MIC 50 , 0.06 µg/mL) compared to E. faecium (MIC 50 , 1 µg/mL). SOL was very active against S. pneumoniae (SPN; MIC 90 , 0.12 µg/mL), Viridans group streptococci (MIC 90 , 0.06 µg/mL) and β-haemolytic streptococci (VGS and BHS; MIC 90 , 0.06 and ≤0.03 µg/mL). SPN isolates were only 88.9, 59.2 and 77.2% S to penicillin (PEN), ERY and clindamycin (CLI), respectively. SOL was very active against M. catarrhalis (MCAT; MIC 90 , ≤0.12 µg/mL) with lower activity against H. influenzae (HI; MIC 50/90 , 2/2 µg/mL); however, SOL displayed four-fold greater activity than ERY against HI.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Results: Against S. aureus (SA), SOL (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/>4 µg/mL) displayed similar activity to telithromycin (TEL; MIC 50/90 , ≤0.06/>8 µg/mL) and four-fold greater than erythromycin (ERY; MIC 50 , 0.5 µg/mL). SOL (MIC 50/90 , ≤0.03/>4 µg/mL) showed comparable activity to TEL against CoNS (78.2% S). Methicillin (M) R SA (40.2%) and CoNS (68.4%) displayed higher SOL MICs compared to MS strains. SOL was moderately active against enterococci (ENT; MIC 50/90 , 0.5/2 µg/mL), but was two-fold more potent than TEL (MIC 50/90 , 1/4 µg/mL). SOL exhibited greater potency against E. faecalis (MIC 50 , 0.06 µg/mL) compared to E. faecium (MIC 50 , 1 µg/mL). SOL was very active against S. pneumoniae (SPN; MIC 90 , 0.12 µg/mL), Viridans group streptococci (MIC 90 , 0.06 µg/mL) and β-haemolytic streptococci (VGS and BHS; MIC 90 , 0.06 and ≤0.03 µg/mL). SPN isolates were only 88.9, 59.2 and 77.2% S to penicillin (PEN), ERY and clindamycin (CLI), respectively. SOL was very active against M. catarrhalis (MCAT; MIC 90 , ≤0.12 µg/mL) with lower activity against H. influenzae (HI; MIC 50/90 , 2/2 µg/mL); however, SOL displayed four-fold greater activity than ERY against HI.
Key concepts: Microbiology, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Penicillin, Moraxella catarrhalis, Erythromycin, Staphylococcus aureus, Potency, Clindamycin