on private lands in the United States
Delwin E. Benson
Abstract
Delwin E. Benson
Abstract
The public owns wildlife in North America, but landowners managethe habitat, influ- ence reproductive potentials, and control the access to wildlife on private lands. Unfortunately, landowners do not always view wildlife positively, owing to damages sus- tained, wildlife's competition with domestic production, and errant behaviors of users who access private lands. Recreational activities such as fee-hunting and wildlife view- ing provide quality experiences for the recreationists and incentives for the landowners to keep wildlife. Private lands are found on 66% of the United States and contribute 80% of wildlife habitats, thus they are important to animal production, recreational use! and society. Expenditures for wildlife-based recreation totaled $101.2 billion in the United States (U.S.), with most money spent on equipment and trip-related costs (90°/O) for con- sumptive uses and 89% for nonconsumptive uses. Only $3.2 billion was spent for land leasing or ownership, yet hunting was practiced most on private lands (51%) or on pub- lic and private lands combined (30°/O). Nonconsumptive uses were fewer on private lands (10%) or on public and private lands combined (34°/O), yet those levels of use are signif- icant enough to merit commensurate financial and management attention. Landowners need to participate in the management and in the profit-taking associated with the pro- duction of wildlife and the recreation it provides. Management and use of private lands should be increased by enfranchising private landowners to be partners with governments (which are entrusted as custodians over wildlife resources). Options for lJ. S. Iandown- ers to consider include: hunting, fishing, bed and breakfasts, ranch recreation, snow sports, wilderness experiences, wildlife viewing, nature study, and other nonconsumptive activities. Partnerships among landowners, governments, businesses, usersr and commu- nities are encouraged, whereby planning, programst and evaluation can be integrated.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The public owns wildlife in North America, but landowners managethe habitat, influ- ence reproductive potentials, and control the access to wildlife on private lands. Unfortunately, landowners do not always view wildlife positively, owing to damages sus- tained, wildlife's competition with domestic production, and errant behaviors of users who access private lands. Recreational activities such as fee-hunting and wildlife view- ing provide quality experiences for the recreationists and incentives for the landowners to keep wildlife. Private lands are found on 66% of the United States and contribute 80% of wildlife habitats, thus they are important to animal production, recreational use! and society. Expenditures for wildlife-based recreation totaled $101.2 billion in the United States (U.S.), with most money spent on equipment and trip-related costs (90°/O) for con- sumptive uses and 89% for nonconsumptive uses. Only $3.2 billion was spent for land leasing or ownership, yet hunting was practiced most on private lands (51%) or on pub- lic and private lands combined (30°/O). Nonconsumptive uses were fewer on private lands (10%) or on public and private lands combined (34°/O), yet those levels of use are signif- icant enough to merit commensurate financial and management attention. Landowners need to participate in the management and in the profit-taking associated with the pro- duction of wildlife and the recreation it provides. Management and use of private lands should be increased by enfranchising private landowners to be partners with governments (which are entrusted as custodians over wildlife resources). Options for lJ. S. Iandown- ers to consider include: hunting, fishing, bed and breakfasts, ranch recreation, snow sports, wilderness experiences, wildlife viewing, nature study, and other nonconsumptive activities. Partnerships among landowners, governments, businesses, usersr and commu- nities are encouraged, whereby planning, programst and evaluation can be integrated.
Key concepts: Wildlife, Recreation, Business, Incentive, North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, Natural resource economics, Damages, Wildlife management