1998Human Dimensions of WildlifeRequires access

Enfranchise landowners for land and wildlife stewardship: Examples from the Western United States

Delwin E. Benson

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Programs for wildlife and recreation management on private lands are evolving in the western United States where the mix of public and private lands creates heightened management dilemmas between public wildlife ownership and private land use. In these programs, landowners are enfranchised to manage their resources for personal gains and for the benefits of the land, wildlife, and society. Some landowners have capitalized on a demand for hunting access and are using market‐oriented, fee‐based management systems as a reward for their stewardship and land access. Landowners have great power over land use and public access on their lands, effectively controlling wildlife and recreation policy, sometimes for the good and sometimes to the detriment of habitats, wildlife, users, and society. However, public sentiment is still uncertain about whether providing greater authority and responsibility to the private sector is valuable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Programs for wildlife and recreation management on private lands are evolving in the western United States where the mix of public and private lands creates heightened management dilemmas between public wildlife ownership and private land use. In these programs, landowners are enfranchised to manage their resources for personal gains and for the benefits of the land, wildlife, and society. Some landowners have capitalized on a demand for hunting access and are using market‐oriented, fee‐based management systems as a reward for their stewardship and land access. Landowners have great power over land use and public access on their lands, effectively controlling wildlife and recreation policy, sometimes for the good and sometimes to the detriment of habitats, wildlife, users, and society. However, public sentiment is still uncertain about whether providing greater authority and responsibility to the private sector is valuable.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Programs for wildlife and recreation management on private lands are evolving in the western United States where the mix of public and private lands creates heightened management dilemmas between public wildlife ownership and private land use. In these programs, landowners are enfranchised to manage their resources for personal gains and for the benefits of the land, wildlife, and society. Some landowners have capitalized on a demand for hunting access and are using market‐oriented, fee‐based management systems as a reward for their stewardship and land access. Landowners have great power over land use and public access on their lands, effectively controlling wildlife and recreation policy, sometimes for the good and sometimes to the detriment of habitats, wildlife, users, and society. However, public sentiment is still uncertain about whether providing greater authority and responsibility to the private sector is valuable.

Key concepts: Stewardship (theology), Wildlife, Recreation, Public land, Business, Environmental stewardship, Wildlife management, Land tenure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enfranchise landowners for land and wildlife stewardship: Examples from the Western United States — Research Paper | ScholarLens