1999Statistica SinicaRequires access

On the relationship between Bayesian and non-Bayesian elimination of nuisance parameters

Thomas A. Severini

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

Consider a statistical model parameterized by a scalar parameter of in- terest θ and a nuisance parameter λ. Many methods of inference are based on a function, a function of the data and θ that has properties similar to those of a likelihood function. Commonly used pseudo-likelihood func- tions include conditional likelihood functions, marginal likelihood functions, and profile likelihood functions. From the Bayesian point of view, elimination of λ is easily achieved by integrating the likelihood function with respect to a conditional prior density π(λ|θ); this approach has some well-known optimality properties. In this paper, we study how close certain pseudo-likelihood functions are to being of Bayesian form. It is shown that many commonly used non-Bayesian methods of eliminating λ correspond to Bayesian elimination of λ to a high degree of approxi-

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Consider a statistical model parameterized by a scalar parameter of in- terest θ and a nuisance parameter λ. Many methods of inference are based on a function, a function of the data and θ that has properties similar to those of a likelihood function. Commonly used pseudo-likelihood func- tions include conditional likelihood functions, marginal likelihood functions, and profile likelihood functions. From the Bayesian point of view, elimination of λ is easily achieved by integrating the likelihood function with respect to a conditional prior density π(λ|θ); this approach has some well-known optimality properties. In this paper, we study how close certain pseudo-likelihood functions are to being of Bayesian form. It is shown that many commonly used non-Bayesian methods of eliminating λ correspond to Bayesian elimination of λ to a high degree of approxi-

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Consider a statistical model parameterized by a scalar parameter of in- terest θ and a nuisance parameter λ. Many methods of inference are based on a function, a function of the data and θ that has properties similar to those of a likelihood function. Commonly used pseudo-likelihood func- tions include conditional likelihood functions, marginal likelihood functions, and profile likelihood functions. From the Bayesian point of view, elimination of λ is easily achieved by integrating the likelihood function with respect to a conditional prior density π(λ|θ); this approach has some well-known optimality properties. In this paper, we study how close certain pseudo-likelihood functions are to being of Bayesian form. It is shown that many commonly used non-Bayesian methods of eliminating λ correspond to Bayesian elimination of λ to a high degree of approxi-

Key concepts: Marginal likelihood, Likelihood function, Bayesian probability, Likelihood principle, Mathematics, Restricted maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, Nuisance parameter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the relationship between Bayesian and non-Bayesian elimination of nuisance parameters — Research Paper | ScholarLens