1992BiometrikaRequires access

Proper likelihoods for Bayesian analysis

John F. Monahan, Dennis D. Boos

Open publisher page 115 citations

Abstract

The validity of posterior probability statements follows from probability calculus when the likelihood is the density of the observations. To investigate other cases, a second, more intuitive definition of validity is introduced, based on coverage of posterior sets. This notion of validity suggests that the likelihood must be the density of a statistic, not necessarily sufficient, for posterior probability statements to be valid. A convenient numerical method is proposed to invalidate the use of certain likelihoods for Bayesian analysis. Integrated, marginal, and conditional likelihoods, derived to avoid nuisance parameters, are also discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The validity of posterior probability statements follows from probability calculus when the likelihood is the density of the observations. To investigate other cases, a second, more intuitive definition of validity is introduced, based on coverage of posterior sets. This notion of validity suggests that the likelihood must be the density of a statistic, not necessarily sufficient, for posterior probability statements to be valid. A convenient numerical method is proposed to invalidate the use of certain likelihoods for Bayesian analysis. Integrated, marginal, and conditional likelihoods, derived to avoid nuisance parameters, are also discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 115 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The validity of posterior probability statements follows from probability calculus when the likelihood is the density of the observations. To investigate other cases, a second, more intuitive definition of validity is introduced, based on coverage of posterior sets. This notion of validity suggests that the likelihood must be the density of a statistic, not necessarily sufficient, for posterior probability statements to be valid. A convenient numerical method is proposed to invalidate the use of certain likelihoods for Bayesian analysis. Integrated, marginal, and conditional likelihoods, derived to avoid nuisance parameters, are also discussed.

Key concepts: Bayesian probability, State (computer science), Library science, South carolina, Statistics, Mathematics, Computer science, Algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Proper likelihoods for Bayesian analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens