Proper likelihoods for Bayesian analysis
John F. Monahan, Dennis D. Boos
Abstract
John F. Monahan, Dennis D. Boos
Abstract
The validity of posterior probability statements follows from probability calculus when the likelihood is the density of the observations. To investigate other cases, a second, more intuitive definition of validity is introduced, based on coverage of posterior sets. This notion of validity suggests that the likelihood must be the density of a statistic, not necessarily sufficient, for posterior probability statements to be valid. A convenient numerical method is proposed to invalidate the use of certain likelihoods for Bayesian analysis. Integrated, marginal, and conditional likelihoods, derived to avoid nuisance parameters, are also discussed.
OpenAlex reports 115 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The validity of posterior probability statements follows from probability calculus when the likelihood is the density of the observations. To investigate other cases, a second, more intuitive definition of validity is introduced, based on coverage of posterior sets. This notion of validity suggests that the likelihood must be the density of a statistic, not necessarily sufficient, for posterior probability statements to be valid. A convenient numerical method is proposed to invalidate the use of certain likelihoods for Bayesian analysis. Integrated, marginal, and conditional likelihoods, derived to avoid nuisance parameters, are also discussed.
Key concepts: Bayesian probability, State (computer science), Library science, South carolina, Statistics, Mathematics, Computer science, Algorithm