2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftaroline Tested Against Streptococci from United States (USA) and European (EU) Medical Centers: Results from the Ceftaroline Surveillance Program

Ronald N. Jones, D P Biek, Ian A. Critchley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Results: Penicillin (PEN) S (≤0.06/≤2 µg/mL) among S. pneumoniae (SPN) were 58/87% in the USA and 73/92% in EU. CPT (MIC 90 /highest MIC, 0.12/0.5 μg/mL) was 8-fold more potent than ceftriaxone (CRO; MIC 90 , 1 μg/mL; 91% S) and 32- to 64-fold more potent than cefuroxime (FUR; MIC 90 , 4-8 µg/mL; 70-80% S). SPN S to amoxicillin/clavulanate (A/C), azithromycin, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin (LEV) were (USA/EU): 83/93, 59/66, 66/71 and 99/97%, respectively. Against β-haemolytic streptococci (βHS), CPT was 2- to 4-fold more potent than PEN (MIC 90 , 0.06 µg/mL) and 32- to ≥128-fold more potent than linezolid or LEV (MIC 90 , 1 µg/mL for both). All βHS strains were inhibited at ≤0.06 µg/mL of CPT and LEV R was observed in 4 βHS from the USA. CPT was also very active against viridans gr. streptococci (VGS; MIC 90 , 0.12 µg/mL) and all isolates except 1 were inhibited at ≤1 µg/mL of CPT. S to PEN, CRO and LEV among VGS were (USA/EU): 72/78, 90/92 and 86/89%, respectively. • The highest ceftaroline MIC values observed among penicillin- susceptible (MIC, ≤0.06 µg/mL), penicillin-intermediate (MIC, 0.12 - 1 µg/mL), and penicillin-resistant (MIC, ≥2 µg/mL) strains of S. pneumoniae were 0.06, 0.25, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively (Table 3); while the MIC 50 varied from ≤0.008 µg/mL for the penicillin- susceptible to 0.12 µg/mL for the penicillin-resistant strains (Tables 1 and 2). • As with other β-lactams, the in vitro activity of ceftaroline increased with increasing susceptibility to penicillin. Ceftaroline

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Results: Penicillin (PEN) S (≤0.06/≤2 µg/mL) among S. pneumoniae (SPN) were 58/87% in the USA and 73/92% in EU. CPT (MIC 90 /highest MIC, 0.12/0.5 μg/mL) was 8-fold more potent than ceftriaxone (CRO; MIC 90 , 1 μg/mL; 91% S) and 32- to 64-fold more potent than cefuroxime (FUR; MIC 90 , 4-8 µg/mL; 70-80% S). SPN S to amoxicillin/clavulanate (A/C), azithromycin, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin (LEV) were (USA/EU): 83/93, 59/66, 66/71 and 99/97%, respectively. Against β-haemolytic streptococci (βHS), CPT was 2- to 4-fold more potent than PEN (MIC 90 , 0.06 µg/mL) and 32- to ≥128-fold more potent than linezolid or LEV (MIC 90 , 1 µg/mL for both). All βHS strains were inhibited at ≤0.06 µg/mL of CPT and LEV R was observed in 4 βHS from the USA. CPT was also very active against viridans gr. streptococci (VGS; MIC 90 , 0.12 µg/mL) and all isolates except 1 were inhibited at ≤1 µg/mL of CPT. S to PEN, CRO and LEV among VGS were (USA/EU): 72/78, 90/92 and 86/89%, respectively. • The highest ceftaroline MIC values observed among penicillin- susceptible (MIC, ≤0.06 µg/mL), penicillin-intermediate (MIC, 0.12 - 1 µg/mL), and penicillin-resistant (MIC, ≥2 µg/mL) strains of S. pneumoniae were 0.06, 0.25, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively (Table 3); while the MIC 50 varied from ≤0.008 µg/mL for the penicillin- susceptible to 0.12 µg/mL for the penicillin-resistant strains (Tables 1 and 2). • As with other β-lactams, the in vitro activity of ceftaroline increased with increasing susceptibility to penicillin. Ceftaroline

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Results: Penicillin (PEN) S (≤0.06/≤2 µg/mL) among S. pneumoniae (SPN) were 58/87% in the USA and 73/92% in EU. CPT (MIC 90 /highest MIC, 0.12/0.5 μg/mL) was 8-fold more potent than ceftriaxone (CRO; MIC 90 , 1 μg/mL; 91% S) and 32- to 64-fold more potent than cefuroxime (FUR; MIC 90 , 4-8 µg/mL; 70-80% S). SPN S to amoxicillin/clavulanate (A/C), azithromycin, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin (LEV) were (USA/EU): 83/93, 59/66, 66/71 and 99/97%, respectively. Against β-haemolytic streptococci (βHS), CPT was 2- to 4-fold more potent than PEN (MIC 90 , 0.06 µg/mL) and 32- to ≥128-fold more potent than linezolid or LEV (MIC 90 , 1 µg/mL for both). All βHS strains were inhibited at ≤0.06 µg/mL of CPT and LEV R was observed in 4 βHS from the USA. CPT was also very active against viridans gr. streptococci (VGS; MIC 90 , 0.12 µg/mL) and all isolates except 1 were inhibited at ≤1 µg/mL of CPT. S to PEN, CRO and LEV among VGS were (USA/EU): 72/78, 90/92 and 86/89%, respectively. • The highest ceftaroline MIC values observed among penicillin- susceptible (MIC, ≤0.06 µg/mL), penicillin-intermediate (MIC, 0.12 - 1 µg/mL), and penicillin-resistant (MIC, ≥2 µg/mL) strains of S. pneumoniae were 0.06, 0.25, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively (Table 3); while the MIC 50 varied from ≤0.008 µg/mL for the penicillin- susceptible to 0.12 µg/mL for the penicillin-resistant strains (Tables 1 and 2). • As with other β-lactams, the in vitro activity of ceftaroline increased with increasing susceptibility to penicillin. Ceftaroline

Key concepts: Penicillin, Microbiology, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Levofloxacin, Trimethoprim, Cefuroxime, Ceftriaxone, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftaroline Tested Against Streptococci from United States (USA) and European (EU) Medical Centers: Results from the Ceftaroline Surveillance Program — Research Paper | ScholarLens