2009Unpublished venueRequires access

MODERN SCIENCE AND SCIENTISM A PERENNIALIST APPRAISAL

Muhammad Maroof Shah, Manzoor A. Shah

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

There have been significant critiques of scientism and certain elements of modern science inspired worldview from various quarters. But perhaps the most thoroughgoing, most uncompromising and most devastating critique that is based on alternative vision of Science and Epistemology and Metaphysics has come from the perennialists. In the present paper modernist scientific worldview shared by the dominant majority of scientists and philosophers of science has been critiqued from the perennialist perspective of Frithjof Schuon. Modern science’s commitment to positivist reductionist naturalist evolutionist worldview and methodology cultivated in transcendence denying secularist framework has been forcefully critiqued by the perennialists. The perennialist critique of scientism has largely gone unnoticed in academic circles. This paper highlights the limitations of orthodox scientistic worldview from the traditionalist perennialist perspective on methodological, epistemological and metaphysical grounds.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There have been significant critiques of scientism and certain elements of modern science inspired worldview from various quarters. But perhaps the most thoroughgoing, most uncompromising and most devastating critique that is based on alternative vision of Science and Epistemology and Metaphysics has come from the perennialists. In the present paper modernist scientific worldview shared by the dominant majority of scientists and philosophers of science has been critiqued from the perennialist perspective of Frithjof Schuon. Modern science’s commitment to positivist reductionist naturalist evolutionist worldview and methodology cultivated in transcendence denying secularist framework has been forcefully critiqued by the perennialists. The perennialist critique of scientism has largely gone unnoticed in academic circles. This paper highlights the limitations of orthodox scientistic worldview from the traditionalist perennialist perspective on methodological, epistemological and metaphysical grounds.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There have been significant critiques of scientism and certain elements of modern science inspired worldview from various quarters. But perhaps the most thoroughgoing, most uncompromising and most devastating critique that is based on alternative vision of Science and Epistemology and Metaphysics has come from the perennialists. In the present paper modernist scientific worldview shared by the dominant majority of scientists and philosophers of science has been critiqued from the perennialist perspective of Frithjof Schuon. Modern science’s commitment to positivist reductionist naturalist evolutionist worldview and methodology cultivated in transcendence denying secularist framework has been forcefully critiqued by the perennialists. The perennialist critique of scientism has largely gone unnoticed in academic circles. This paper highlights the limitations of orthodox scientistic worldview from the traditionalist perennialist perspective on methodological, epistemological and metaphysical grounds.

Key concepts: Scientism, Epistemology, Reductionism, Metaphysics, Positivism, Naturalism, Philosophy, Relativism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MODERN SCIENCE AND SCIENTISM A PERENNIALIST APPRAISAL — Research Paper | ScholarLens