2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Phase-Contrast Light Microscopy of Living Cells Cultured in Small Volumes

Elisabeth Horn, Roman Zantl

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Phase contrast, one of the most commonly used contrasting techniques in light microscopy, has crucial drawbacks when used to image cells in small culture wells due to the formation of a meniscus at the airwater interface. In this study we demonstrate how it is possible to perform phasecontrast microscopy on living cells in volumes of less than 30 µl. Adherent cells were cultured in the 25 µl channels of microslides, fluorescently stained, and observed by phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy. 95% of the cells were accessible by phase contrast in the channels, whereas in the 96-well plates only 1% of the culture area showed satisfactory contrast. In order to explain this finding we have analysed the optical basis of phase-contrast microscopy to elucidate the disturbing influence of a meniscus on the optical light path.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Phase contrast, one of the most commonly used contrasting techniques in light microscopy, has crucial drawbacks when used to image cells in small culture wells due to the formation of a meniscus at the airwater interface. In this study we demonstrate how it is possible to perform phasecontrast microscopy on living cells in volumes of less than 30 µl. Adherent cells were cultured in the 25 µl channels of microslides, fluorescently stained, and observed by phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy. 95% of the cells were accessible by phase contrast in the channels, whereas in the 96-well plates only 1% of the culture area showed satisfactory contrast. In order to explain this finding we have analysed the optical basis of phase-contrast microscopy to elucidate the disturbing influence of a meniscus on the optical light path.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Phase contrast, one of the most commonly used contrasting techniques in light microscopy, has crucial drawbacks when used to image cells in small culture wells due to the formation of a meniscus at the airwater interface. In this study we demonstrate how it is possible to perform phasecontrast microscopy on living cells in volumes of less than 30 µl. Adherent cells were cultured in the 25 µl channels of microslides, fluorescently stained, and observed by phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy. 95% of the cells were accessible by phase contrast in the channels, whereas in the 96-well plates only 1% of the culture area showed satisfactory contrast. In order to explain this finding we have analysed the optical basis of phase-contrast microscopy to elucidate the disturbing influence of a meniscus on the optical light path.

Key concepts: Phase contrast microscopy, Microscopy, Bright-field microscopy, Fluorescence microscope, Optical microscope, Contrast (vision), Differential interference contrast microscopy, Video microscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phase-Contrast Light Microscopy of Living Cells Cultured in Small Volumes — Research Paper | ScholarLens