2010Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

Influence of sample preparation and identification of subcelluar structures in quantitative holographic phase contrast microscopy

Björn Kemper, Lisa Schmidt, Sabine Przibilla, Christina E. Rommel, Angelika Vollmer, Steffi Ketelhut, Jürgen Schnekenburger, Gert von Bally

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) provides label-free quantitative phase contrast with low demands on sample preparation. Nevertheless, for DHM measurements on fixed cells the mounting medium has to be considered while the phase contrast of living cells may be influenced by the used buffer solution. To quantify these effects, the maximum cell caused phase contrast and the visibility of the nucleoli were analyzed. A second aim of the study was to identify subcellular components in DHM phase contrast images. Therefore, comparative investigations using bright field imaging, DHM and fluorescence microscopy with 4',6- Diamidino-2-phenylindol (DAPI) staining were performed. DAPI-staining visualizes cell components containing DNA. The obtained results demonstrate exemplarily for two tumor cell lines that from DHM phase contrast images of fixed cells in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) cell thickness values are obtained which are comparable to living cells. Furthermore, it is shown that in many cases nucleus components can be identified only by DHM phase contrast.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) provides label-free quantitative phase contrast with low demands on sample preparation. Nevertheless, for DHM measurements on fixed cells the mounting medium has to be considered while the phase contrast of living cells may be influenced by the used buffer solution. To quantify these effects, the maximum cell caused phase contrast and the visibility of the nucleoli were analyzed. A second aim of the study was to identify subcellular components in DHM phase contrast images. Therefore, comparative investigations using bright field imaging, DHM and fluorescence microscopy with 4',6- Diamidino-2-phenylindol (DAPI) staining were performed. DAPI-staining visualizes cell components containing DNA. The obtained results demonstrate exemplarily for two tumor cell lines that from DHM phase contrast images of fixed cells in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) cell thickness values are obtained which are comparable to living cells. Furthermore, it is shown that in many cases nucleus components can be identified only by DHM phase contrast.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) provides label-free quantitative phase contrast with low demands on sample preparation. Nevertheless, for DHM measurements on fixed cells the mounting medium has to be considered while the phase contrast of living cells may be influenced by the used buffer solution. To quantify these effects, the maximum cell caused phase contrast and the visibility of the nucleoli were analyzed. A second aim of the study was to identify subcellular components in DHM phase contrast images. Therefore, comparative investigations using bright field imaging, DHM and fluorescence microscopy with 4',6- Diamidino-2-phenylindol (DAPI) staining were performed. DAPI-staining visualizes cell components containing DNA. The obtained results demonstrate exemplarily for two tumor cell lines that from DHM phase contrast images of fixed cells in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) cell thickness values are obtained which are comparable to living cells. Furthermore, it is shown that in many cases nucleus components can be identified only by DHM phase contrast.

Key concepts: Microscopy, DAPI, Digital holographic microscopy, Phase contrast microscopy, Fluorescence microscope, Differential interference contrast microscopy, Materials science, Optical microscope

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of sample preparation and identification of subcelluar structures in quantitative holographic phase contrast microscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens