2005VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)Open access

Assessment of the Measurement Repeatability and Sensitivity of a Noninvasive Blood Perfusion Measuring Probe

Caroline Marie Comas

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Blood perfusion is the local, non-directional blood flow through tissue. It is measured as the volumetric flow rate of blood through a given volume of tissue. One method that has been developed for measuring blood perfusion is a probe that measures the temperature response of the tissue when a thermal event is applied. From the temperature response, the blood perfusion and contact resistance can be estimated by comparing the experimental response to a predicted response, and employing Gaussian minimization techniques to estimate the blood perfusion and contact resistance. The objective of this research was to assess the measurement repeatability and sensitivity of the blood perfusion probe by testing the probe on phantom tissue, such that the effects of physiologic or pathologic conditions on the blood perfusion could be eliminated. Another objective was to conduct a preliminary in vivo study using rats for the purpose of establishing proper experimental protocols for future testing of the blood perfusion probe. A phantom tissue test stand comprised of porous material and water to simulate tissue and blood, respectively, was constructed for the phantom study. Inlet flow rates into the porous media ranging between 0 cc/min and 30 cc/min were tested. To test the measurement repeatability 7 flow rates (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cc/min) were tested on two different days. To test the measurement sensitivity of the probe, flow rates between 0 and 10 cc/min, and 15 and 20 cc/min were tested at intervals of 1 cc/min. From the phantom study it was concluded that the probe displayed good measurement repeatability, as the trend in perfusion as a function of inlet flow rates for both days was found to be the same. It was also found that the data collected using the probe yielded significantly different perfusion estimates for different flow rates, as statistical analyses show that the average perfusion differences between flow rates are truly independent within a 90% confidence interval, for flow differences above 4 cc/min. It was found that for flow rates below 4 cc/min the probe sensitivity was significantly reduced. For the in vivo study it was concluded that the probe can be used to obtain estimates of perfusion from rats. This preliminary study also served to establish proper experimental protocols for future tests.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Blood perfusion is the local, non-directional blood flow through tissue. It is measured as the volumetric flow rate of blood through a given volume of tissue. One method that has been developed for measuring blood perfusion is a probe that measures the temperature response of the tissue when a thermal event is applied. From the temperature response, the blood perfusion and contact resistance can be estimated by comparing the experimental response to a predicted response, and employing Gaussian minimization techniques to estimate the blood perfusion and contact resistance. The objective of this research was to assess the measurement repeatability and sensitivity of the blood perfusion probe by testing the probe on phantom tissue, such that the effects of physiologic or pathologic conditions on the blood perfusion could be eliminated. Another objective was to conduct a preliminary in vivo study using rats for the purpose of establishing proper experimental protocols for future testing of the blood perfusion probe. A phantom tissue test stand comprised of porous material and water to simulate tissue and blood, respectively, was constructed for the phantom study. Inlet flow rates into the porous media ranging between 0 cc/min and 30 cc/min were tested. To test the measurement repeatability 7 flow rates (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cc/min) were tested on two different days. To test the measurement sensitivity of the probe, flow rates between 0 and 10 cc/min, and 15 and 20 cc/min were tested at intervals of 1 cc/min. From the phantom study it was concluded that the probe displayed good measurement repeatability, as the trend in perfusion as a function of inlet flow rates for both days was found to be the same. It was also found that the data collected using the probe yielded significantly different perfusion estimates for different flow rates, as statistical analyses show that the average perfusion differences between flow rates are truly independent within a 90% confidence interval, for flow differences above 4 cc/min. It was found that for flow rates below 4 cc/min the probe sensitivity was significantly reduced. For the in vivo study it was concluded that the probe can be used to obtain estimates of perfusion from rats. This preliminary study also served to establish proper experimental protocols for future tests.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Blood perfusion is the local, non-directional blood flow through tissue. It is measured as the volumetric flow rate of blood through a given volume of tissue. One method that has been developed for measuring blood perfusion is a probe that measures the temperature response of the tissue when a thermal event is applied. From the temperature response, the blood perfusion and contact resistance can be estimated by comparing the experimental response to a predicted response, and employing Gaussian minimization techniques to estimate the blood perfusion and contact resistance. The objective of this research was to assess the measurement repeatability and sensitivity of the blood perfusion probe by testing the probe on phantom tissue, such that the effects of physiologic or pathologic conditions on the blood perfusion could be eliminated. Another objective was to conduct a preliminary in vivo study using rats for the purpose of establishing proper experimental protocols for future testing of the blood perfusion probe. A phantom tissue test stand comprised of porous material and water to simulate tissue and blood, respectively, was constructed for the phantom study. Inlet flow rates into the porous media ranging between 0 cc/min and 30 cc/min were tested. To test the measurement repeatability 7 flow rates (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cc/min) were tested on two different days. To test the measurement sensitivity of the probe, flow rates between 0 and 10 cc/min, and 15 and 20 cc/min were tested at intervals of 1 cc/min. From the phantom study it was concluded that the probe displayed good measurement repeatability, as the trend in perfusion as a function of inlet flow rates for both days was found to be the same. It was also found that the data collected using the probe yielded significantly different perfusion estimates for different flow rates, as statistical analyses show that the average perfusion differences between flow rates are truly independent within a 90% confidence interval, for flow differences above 4 cc/min. It was found that for flow rates below 4 cc/min the probe sensitivity was significantly reduced. For the in vivo study it was concluded that the probe can be used to obtain estimates of perfusion from rats. This preliminary study also served to establish proper experimental protocols for future tests.

Key concepts: Repeatability, Perfusion, Imaging phantom, Biomedical engineering, Blood flow, Blood volume, Materials science, Sensitivity (control systems)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of the Measurement Repeatability and Sensitivity of a Noninvasive Blood Perfusion Measuring Probe — Research Paper | ScholarLens