1985•Hazardous Waste and Hazardous MaterialsRequires access

Hazardous Waste and Policy Implementation: The Subnational Role

James P. Lester

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) allows state governments policy development opportunities and operational responsibility for their hazardous waste program. States must establish programs that meet minimum federal requirements or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will itself develop and implement a program in that state. During 1980-1985, a number of states have been granted either "interim" or "full" authorization by the EPA for their hazardous waste programs. However, substantial variation still exists in terms of states' commitment to the responsible management of hazardous wastes. This article describes state policy responses toward program responsibility for hazardous waste management and then analyzes the factors that have delayed implementation of RCRA. In doing so, it also suggests prospects for (and problems of) empirically testing hypotheses concerned with hazardous waste policy implementation within the subnational context.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) allows state governments policy development opportunities and operational responsibility for their hazardous waste program. States must establish programs that meet minimum federal requirements or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will itself develop and implement a program in that state. During 1980-1985, a number of states have been granted either "interim" or "full" authorization by the EPA for their hazardous waste programs. However, substantial variation still exists in terms of states' commitment to the responsible management of hazardous wastes. This article describes state policy responses toward program responsibility for hazardous waste management and then analyzes the factors that have delayed implementation of RCRA. In doing so, it also suggests prospects for (and problems of) empirically testing hypotheses concerned with hazardous waste policy implementation within the subnational context.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) allows state governments policy development opportunities and operational responsibility for their hazardous waste program. States must establish programs that meet minimum federal requirements or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will itself develop and implement a program in that state. During 1980-1985, a number of states have been granted either "interim" or "full" authorization by the EPA for their hazardous waste programs. However, substantial variation still exists in terms of states' commitment to the responsible management of hazardous wastes. This article describes state policy responses toward program responsibility for hazardous waste management and then analyzes the factors that have delayed implementation of RCRA. In doing so, it also suggests prospects for (and problems of) empirically testing hypotheses concerned with hazardous waste policy implementation within the subnational context.

Key concepts: Hazardous waste, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Interim, Context (archaeology), Business, Authorization, Waste management, Agency (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hazardous Waste and Policy Implementation: The Subnational Role — Research Paper | ScholarLens