1992European Accounting ReviewRequires access

Audit policy making in the UK

Prem Sikka

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

In accounting discourses, the going concern concept is considered to be ‘fundamental’ yet in auditing it is considered to be ‘material but not fundamental’. Like all other social concepts and practices, ‘going concern’ is multi-accented and its meanings cannot be stabilized. Against such a background, the UK accountancy bodies formulated and issued the auditing guideline The Auditor's Considerations in Respect of Going Concern in 1985. The purpose of this paper is to explore audit policy making in the UK by examining the formulation of the auditing guideline. The evidence suggests that the auditing guideline was an attempt by the professional bodies to manage a crisis of auditor responsibility. It suggests that a major aim of the guideline was to minimize audit effort in order to give maximum protection from litigation to major auditing firms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In accounting discourses, the going concern concept is considered to be ‘fundamental’ yet in auditing it is considered to be ‘material but not fundamental’. Like all other social concepts and practices, ‘going concern’ is multi-accented and its meanings cannot be stabilized. Against such a background, the UK accountancy bodies formulated and issued the auditing guideline The Auditor's Considerations in Respect of Going Concern in 1985. The purpose of this paper is to explore audit policy making in the UK by examining the formulation of the auditing guideline. The evidence suggests that the auditing guideline was an attempt by the professional bodies to manage a crisis of auditor responsibility. It suggests that a major aim of the guideline was to minimize audit effort in order to give maximum protection from litigation to major auditing firms.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In accounting discourses, the going concern concept is considered to be ‘fundamental’ yet in auditing it is considered to be ‘material but not fundamental’. Like all other social concepts and practices, ‘going concern’ is multi-accented and its meanings cannot be stabilized. Against such a background, the UK accountancy bodies formulated and issued the auditing guideline The Auditor's Considerations in Respect of Going Concern in 1985. The purpose of this paper is to explore audit policy making in the UK by examining the formulation of the auditing guideline. The evidence suggests that the auditing guideline was an attempt by the professional bodies to manage a crisis of auditor responsibility. It suggests that a major aim of the guideline was to minimize audit effort in order to give maximum protection from litigation to major auditing firms.

Key concepts: Audit, Accounting, Guideline, Business, Going concern, Order (exchange), External auditor, Auditor independence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Audit policy making in the UK — Research Paper | ScholarLens