1979•Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyOpen access

Radar Measurement of Rainfall—A Summary

James W. Wilson, Edward A. Brandes

Open full text 529 citations

Abstract

Radar can produce detailed precipitation information for large areas from a single location in real time. Although radar has been used experimentally for nearly 30 years to measure rainfall, operational implementation has been slow. Today we find that data are underutilized and both confusion and misunderstanding exist about the inherent ability of radar to measure rainfall, about factors that contribute to errors, and about the importance of careful calibration and signal processing. Areal and point rainfall estimates are often in error by a factor of two or more. Error sources reside in measurement of radar reflectivity factor, evaporation and advection of precipitation before reaching the ground, and variations in the drop-size distribution and vertical air motions. Nevertheless, radar can be of lifesaving usefulness by alerting forecasters to the potential for flash flooding. The most successful technique for improving the radar rainfall estimates has been to “calibrate” the radar with rain gages. Simple techniques that combine sparse gage reports (one gage per 1000–2000 km2) with radar produce smaller measurement errors (10–30%) than either system alone. When high accuracy rainfall measurements are needed (average error less than about 10–20%) the advantage of radar is diminished, since the number of gages required for calibration is itself sufficient to provide the desired accuracy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Radar can produce detailed precipitation information for large areas from a single location in real time. Although radar has been used experimentally for nearly 30 years to measure rainfall, operational implementation has been slow. Today we find that data are underutilized and both confusion and misunderstanding exist about the inherent ability of radar to measure rainfall, about factors that contribute to errors, and about the importance of careful calibration and signal processing. Areal and point rainfall estimates are often in error by a factor of two or more. Error sources reside in measurement of radar reflectivity factor, evaporation and advection of precipitation before reaching the ground, and variations in the drop-size distribution and vertical air motions. Nevertheless, radar can be of lifesaving usefulness by alerting forecasters to the potential for flash flooding. The most successful technique for improving the radar rainfall estimates has been to “calibrate” the radar with rain gages. Simple techniques that combine sparse gage reports (one gage per 1000–2000 km2) with radar produce smaller measurement errors (10–30%) than either system alone. When high accuracy rainfall measurements are needed (average error less than about 10–20%) the advantage of radar is diminished, since the number of gages required for calibration is itself sufficient to provide the desired accuracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 529 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Radar can produce detailed precipitation information for large areas from a single location in real time. Although radar has been used experimentally for nearly 30 years to measure rainfall, operational implementation has been slow. Today we find that data are underutilized and both confusion and misunderstanding exist about the inherent ability of radar to measure rainfall, about factors that contribute to errors, and about the importance of careful calibration and signal processing. Areal and point rainfall estimates are often in error by a factor of two or more. Error sources reside in measurement of radar reflectivity factor, evaporation and advection of precipitation before reaching the ground, and variations in the drop-size distribution and vertical air motions. Nevertheless, radar can be of lifesaving usefulness by alerting forecasters to the potential for flash flooding. The most successful technique for improving the radar rainfall estimates has been to “calibrate” the radar with rain gages. Simple techniques that combine sparse gage reports (one gage per 1000–2000 km2) with radar produce smaller measurement errors (10–30%) than either system alone. When high accuracy rainfall measurements are needed (average error less than about 10–20%) the advantage of radar is diminished, since the number of gages required for calibration is itself sufficient to provide the desired accuracy.

Key concepts: Radar, Calibration, Rain gauge, Environmental science, Remote sensing, Meteorology, Precipitation, Quantitative precipitation forecast

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Radar Measurement of Rainfall—A Summary — Research Paper | ScholarLens