1979Osgoode Hall law journalOpen access

Discretion in Administrative Law

Julius H. Grey

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

If administrative law is seen as the study of the use of power, one of its most important interests is discretion, since the limits on discretion are at the same time the limits on the power that anyone can have in our type of democracy. The massive expansion of the powers of the state, and the growth of immensely powerful committees, commissions and other bodies, against which may be juxtaposed a new and fervent interest in civil liberties and human rights, renders a re-examination of discretion and discretionary powers both essential and inevitable. It is the purpose of this essay to clarify the concept of discretion, to demonstrate how far the courts have been willing to tolerate it, and to chart some of the new paths that appear to be opening before those who advocate wide judicial review.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

If administrative law is seen as the study of the use of power, one of its most important interests is discretion, since the limits on discretion are at the same time the limits on the power that anyone can have in our type of democracy. The massive expansion of the powers of the state, and the growth of immensely powerful committees, commissions and other bodies, against which may be juxtaposed a new and fervent interest in civil liberties and human rights, renders a re-examination of discretion and discretionary powers both essential and inevitable. It is the purpose of this essay to clarify the concept of discretion, to demonstrate how far the courts have been willing to tolerate it, and to chart some of the new paths that appear to be opening before those who advocate wide judicial review.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

If administrative law is seen as the study of the use of power, one of its most important interests is discretion, since the limits on discretion are at the same time the limits on the power that anyone can have in our type of democracy. The massive expansion of the powers of the state, and the growth of immensely powerful committees, commissions and other bodies, against which may be juxtaposed a new and fervent interest in civil liberties and human rights, renders a re-examination of discretion and discretionary powers both essential and inevitable. It is the purpose of this essay to clarify the concept of discretion, to demonstrate how far the courts have been willing to tolerate it, and to chart some of the new paths that appear to be opening before those who advocate wide judicial review.

Key concepts: Discretion, Administrative discretion, Judicial discretion, Law, Political science, Power (physics), State (computer science), Democracy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discretion in Administrative Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens