An Application of Louver Deflectors for Guiding Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Smolts From Power Turbines
Lynn DuCharme
Abstract
Lynn DuCharme
Abstract
Louver deflectors for guiding Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) away from destructive power turbines were installed in a canal leading to the powerhouse at East River, Sheet Harbour, Nova Scotia, in 1966. Guiding efficiency studies, using hatchery-reared smolts, showed that a minimum approach:bypass velocity ratio of 1.0:1.5 was a prerequisite to high guiding efficiency. From 1967 to 1971, average guiding efficiency was increased from 57% to 80% through modifications which increased velocity and reduced flow turbulence in the bypass. A significant correlation existed between approach velocity and guiding efficiency within the range tested after bypass hydraulics had been modified. Tests conducted with varying louver bar spacing ranging from 5.1 to 30.5 cm (2–12 inches) showed that the wider spacings did not impair guiding efficiency.Vertical distribution of smolt migrants in the power canal indicated that over 80% of the fish remained above depth 1.3 m. This was borne out by the fact that the bypass was effective when operating to a depth of only 0.91 m. An appraisal of the practicality of the louver guiding system is presented.
OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Louver deflectors for guiding Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) away from destructive power turbines were installed in a canal leading to the powerhouse at East River, Sheet Harbour, Nova Scotia, in 1966. Guiding efficiency studies, using hatchery-reared smolts, showed that a minimum approach:bypass velocity ratio of 1.0:1.5 was a prerequisite to high guiding efficiency. From 1967 to 1971, average guiding efficiency was increased from 57% to 80% through modifications which increased velocity and reduced flow turbulence in the bypass. A significant correlation existed between approach velocity and guiding efficiency within the range tested after bypass hydraulics had been modified. Tests conducted with varying louver bar spacing ranging from 5.1 to 30.5 cm (2–12 inches) showed that the wider spacings did not impair guiding efficiency.Vertical distribution of smolt migrants in the power canal indicated that over 80% of the fish remained above depth 1.3 m. This was borne out by the fact that the bypass was effective when operating to a depth of only 0.91 m. An appraisal of the practicality of the louver guiding system is presented.
Key concepts: Salmo, Louver, Environmental science, Turbulence, Marine engineering, Nova scotia, Range (aeronautics), Fishery