2015International Review of Applied EconomicsRequires access

Confronting inequality: review article on Thomas Piketty on ‘Capital in the 2st Century’

Malcolm Sawyer

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This review article on Thomas Piketty’s ‘Capital in the twenty-first century’ opens with a discussion of the trends in income and wealth inequality reported by Piketty and his co-workers. The significance of the rising trends of inequality after 1980 in contrast to the pre-1980 trends is elaborated. It is noted that rising inequality has been accompanied by slower growth. Piketty identifies the relationship between the rate of return on wealth and the rate of growth as a major issue. It is argued here that an excess of savings out of return on wealth over the rate of output growth is unsustainable. It may lead, following Piketty, to rising wealth inequality, but we argue the difference would be deflationary and cause high levels of unemployment. While Piketty favours high income and wealth taxation to address that difference (from which we do not differ), there are additional ways such as enhanced worker power, corporation tax on a coordinated basis to reduce tax competition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This review article on Thomas Piketty’s ‘Capital in the twenty-first century’ opens with a discussion of the trends in income and wealth inequality reported by Piketty and his co-workers. The significance of the rising trends of inequality after 1980 in contrast to the pre-1980 trends is elaborated. It is noted that rising inequality has been accompanied by slower growth. Piketty identifies the relationship between the rate of return on wealth and the rate of growth as a major issue. It is argued here that an excess of savings out of return on wealth over the rate of output growth is unsustainable. It may lead, following Piketty, to rising wealth inequality, but we argue the difference would be deflationary and cause high levels of unemployment. While Piketty favours high income and wealth taxation to address that difference (from which we do not differ), there are additional ways such as enhanced worker power, corporation tax on a coordinated basis to reduce tax competition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This review article on Thomas Piketty’s ‘Capital in the twenty-first century’ opens with a discussion of the trends in income and wealth inequality reported by Piketty and his co-workers. The significance of the rising trends of inequality after 1980 in contrast to the pre-1980 trends is elaborated. It is noted that rising inequality has been accompanied by slower growth. Piketty identifies the relationship between the rate of return on wealth and the rate of growth as a major issue. It is argued here that an excess of savings out of return on wealth over the rate of output growth is unsustainable. It may lead, following Piketty, to rising wealth inequality, but we argue the difference would be deflationary and cause high levels of unemployment. While Piketty favours high income and wealth taxation to address that difference (from which we do not differ), there are additional ways such as enhanced worker power, corporation tax on a coordinated basis to reduce tax competition.

Key concepts: Economics, Inequality, Capital (architecture), Labour economics, Unemployment, Corporation, Competition (biology), Economic inequality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Confronting inequality: review article on Thomas Piketty on ‘Capital in the 2st Century’ — Research Paper | ScholarLens