Lesion Site in Sudden Deafness: Study with Electrocochleography and Transiently Evoked Otoacoustic Emission
Makoto Oda Yutaka Ota
Abstract
Makoto Oda Yutaka Ota
Abstract
We examined electrocochleogram (ECochG) and transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) on five cases of sudden sensorineural hearing loss which had no abnormalities detected on diagnostic imagings and showed complete recovery of hearing. At the initial examination, three cases showed a broadened wave 1 with prolonged latency in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) at 90 dB HL. The ECochG AP showed a broad waveform, low amplitude, and high threshold. CM threshold, although increased, was relatively well preserved compared with hearing threshold measured with conventional pure-tone audiometry. The thresholds in TEOAE examination were similar to those for CM and preserved better when compared with pure-tone audiometric thresholds. These findings suggest that the location of the disorder in these three cases involved not only the cochlea but also the retrocochlear auditory pathway. The other two cases showed normal ABR waveforms at 90 dB HL at the initial examinations. ECochG examination showed that a normal AP in one case and a smaller amplitude AP, an elevated threshold, and normal waveform of AP in the other ear. CM thresholds coincided with the conventional audiometry thresholds. These findings suggest that hearing loss in these two cases involved primarily the sensory hair cells.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We examined electrocochleogram (ECochG) and transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) on five cases of sudden sensorineural hearing loss which had no abnormalities detected on diagnostic imagings and showed complete recovery of hearing. At the initial examination, three cases showed a broadened wave 1 with prolonged latency in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) at 90 dB HL. The ECochG AP showed a broad waveform, low amplitude, and high threshold. CM threshold, although increased, was relatively well preserved compared with hearing threshold measured with conventional pure-tone audiometry. The thresholds in TEOAE examination were similar to those for CM and preserved better when compared with pure-tone audiometric thresholds. These findings suggest that the location of the disorder in these three cases involved not only the cochlea but also the retrocochlear auditory pathway. The other two cases showed normal ABR waveforms at 90 dB HL at the initial examinations. ECochG examination showed that a normal AP in one case and a smaller amplitude AP, an elevated threshold, and normal waveform of AP in the other ear. CM thresholds coincided with the conventional audiometry thresholds. These findings suggest that hearing loss in these two cases involved primarily the sensory hair cells.
Key concepts: Electrocochleography, Audiology, Audiometry, Medicine, Otoacoustic emission, Auditory brainstem response, Cochlea, Tone burst