2010•Lincoln (University of Nebraska)Open access

Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005-2009

S. Thanuskodi

Open full text 59 citations

Abstract

The present study is a bibliometric analysis of articles and references in Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005 to 2009. The analysis covers the number of articles, authorship patterns, subject distribution of articles, average number of references per article, forms of documents cited, year-wise distribution of cited journals, rank list of journals, etc. Strong and weak points are discussed, as the basis for improvement and development.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The present study is a bibliometric analysis of articles and references in Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005 to 2009. The analysis covers the number of articles, authorship patterns, subject distribution of articles, average number of references per article, forms of documents cited, year-wise distribution of cited journals, rank list of journals, etc. Strong and weak points are discussed, as the basis for improvement and development.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The present study is a bibliometric analysis of articles and references in Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005 to 2009. The analysis covers the number of articles, authorship patterns, subject distribution of articles, average number of references per article, forms of documents cited, year-wise distribution of cited journals, rank list of journals, etc. Strong and weak points are discussed, as the basis for improvement and development.

Key concepts: Bibliometrics, Library science, Sophistication, Citation analysis, Sociology, Social science, Citation, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005-2009 — Research Paper | ScholarLens