CCS vs NLDM comparison based on a complete automated correlation flow between PrimeTime and HSPICE
Tariq El Motassadeq
Abstract
Tariq El Motassadeq
Abstract
For submicron designs, it is recommended to use Composite Current Source (CCS) libraries, but is CCS really more accurate than Non-Linear Delay Model (NLDM)? To answer this question, one of the tasks that can be performed is to correlate the results from PrimeTime using CCS and NLDM with the golden results from a circuit simulator such as HSPICE [1]. The focus of this paper is to describe an automated process that allows the user to properly correlate the timing paths delay and slew results from PrimeTime with results from HSPICE based on a real design in 65 nm.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For submicron designs, it is recommended to use Composite Current Source (CCS) libraries, but is CCS really more accurate than Non-Linear Delay Model (NLDM)? To answer this question, one of the tasks that can be performed is to correlate the results from PrimeTime using CCS and NLDM with the golden results from a circuit simulator such as HSPICE [1]. The focus of this paper is to describe an automated process that allows the user to properly correlate the timing paths delay and slew results from PrimeTime with results from HSPICE based on a real design in 65 nm.
Key concepts: Spice, Computer science, Focus (optics), Linear correlation, Process (computing), Design flow, Flow (mathematics), Simulation