Modeling and comparison of different micromachined three-dimensional inductors
Shang-Yu Liang, Shu-Hui Tsai, Chun-Hsien Lee, Ruey‐Shing Huang
Abstract
Shang-Yu Liang, Shu-Hui Tsai, Chun-Hsien Lee, Ruey‐Shing Huang
Abstract
3D inductors have been reported using micromachining technology. However, almost all studies focused on the solenoid type inductors. We present a complete way to analyze different 3D inductors. After decomposing the inductor into several current elements, the mutual inductances within them are presented. Although the solenoid type inductor usually has positive mutual inductances, the toroidal-meander type inductor still has a larger density of inductance in some conditions, especially with a thin intermediate layer. Besides, the latter shows better uniformity of current density, less resistance per unit length and higher quality factor.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
3D inductors have been reported using micromachining technology. However, almost all studies focused on the solenoid type inductors. We present a complete way to analyze different 3D inductors. After decomposing the inductor into several current elements, the mutual inductances within them are presented. Although the solenoid type inductor usually has positive mutual inductances, the toroidal-meander type inductor still has a larger density of inductance in some conditions, especially with a thin intermediate layer. Besides, the latter shows better uniformity of current density, less resistance per unit length and higher quality factor.
Key concepts: Inductor, Solenoid, Inductance, Surface micromachining, Toroid, Q factor, Materials science, Equivalent series resistance