On radiated susceptibility testing of highly directive devices
V Rajamani, Charles F. Bunting
Abstract
V Rajamani, Charles F. Bunting
Abstract
Radiated susceptibility testing of a highly directive device is challenging. To ensure the worst case coupling test in an anechoic chamber, an exhaustive measurement scheme is required which usually is not a viable option. When a test is performed with minimal requirements, the potential to miss susceptibilities are high and the uncertainty worsens when directivity is a function of frequency. Reverberation chambers assure best case susceptibility tests due to the nature of complex cavities but the potential to under test is also present as the directivity of the EUT are smoothed out. In this study, simulations are performed on a box with apertures to calculate directivity. An anechoic chamber test and reverb like tests are simulated to calculate the coupling. The differences in maximums of the induced fields are shown as a comparison.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Radiated susceptibility testing of a highly directive device is challenging. To ensure the worst case coupling test in an anechoic chamber, an exhaustive measurement scheme is required which usually is not a viable option. When a test is performed with minimal requirements, the potential to miss susceptibilities are high and the uncertainty worsens when directivity is a function of frequency. Reverberation chambers assure best case susceptibility tests due to the nature of complex cavities but the potential to under test is also present as the directivity of the EUT are smoothed out. In this study, simulations are performed on a box with apertures to calculate directivity. An anechoic chamber test and reverb like tests are simulated to calculate the coupling. The differences in maximums of the induced fields are shown as a comparison.
Key concepts: Directivity, Anechoic chamber, Electromagnetic reverberation chamber, Acoustics, Coupling (piping), Electromagnetic compatibility, Reverberation, Computer science