Results and insights from the N Reactor Level II/III PRA (probabilistic risk assessment) for application to advanced reactor designs
Gregory Dane Wyss, D.M. Kunsman, A.L. Camp
Abstract
Gregory Dane Wyss, D.M. Kunsman, A.L. Camp
Abstract
A Level II/III probabilistic risk assessment has been performed for N Reactor, a US Department of Energy production reactor. State-of-the-art methodology was employed based on methods developed by Sandia for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the NUREG-1150 study. Latin Hypercube sampling techniques were used to develop uncertainty distributions for the risks associated with postulated core damage events initiated by fire, seismic and internal events as well as the overall combined risk. The results show the risks from N Reactor to be small. Systematic, procedural and phenomenological insights and their significance to future reactor designs are discussed. A key insight is that active systems can inadvertently interfere with passive systems unless proper design precautions are taken. 7 refs., 2 tabs.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A Level II/III probabilistic risk assessment has been performed for N Reactor, a US Department of Energy production reactor. State-of-the-art methodology was employed based on methods developed by Sandia for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the NUREG-1150 study. Latin Hypercube sampling techniques were used to develop uncertainty distributions for the risks associated with postulated core damage events initiated by fire, seismic and internal events as well as the overall combined risk. The results show the risks from N Reactor to be small. Systematic, procedural and phenomenological insights and their significance to future reactor designs are discussed. A key insight is that active systems can inadvertently interfere with passive systems unless proper design precautions are taken. 7 refs., 2 tabs.
Key concepts: Probabilistic risk assessment, Latin hypercube sampling, Probabilistic logic, Nuclear engineering, Nuclear reactor core, Reactor design, Nuclear reactor, Shutdown