1981Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)Requires access

Criticism of the Use of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 for the Quantitative Determination of Proteins

M. G. M. van Wilgenburg, E. M. A. Werkman, W. H. van Gorkom, J.B.J. Soons

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

The quantitative determination of proteins in biological fluids, using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, was evaluated. Compared with the biuret method, the Coomassie Blue G-250 method needs a much shorter time for analysis and has a greater sensitivity. The sensitivity of the dye for albumin is significantly greater than for globulins. The standard curves for the biuret method are more linear than those for the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method. The Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method produces a precipitate, which sticks to the walls of the cuvet and results in an intolerable carry-over. Therefore, the use of the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method for the quantitative determination of proteins in urine and serum is not recommended.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The quantitative determination of proteins in biological fluids, using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, was evaluated. Compared with the biuret method, the Coomassie Blue G-250 method needs a much shorter time for analysis and has a greater sensitivity. The sensitivity of the dye for albumin is significantly greater than for globulins. The standard curves for the biuret method are more linear than those for the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method. The Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method produces a precipitate, which sticks to the walls of the cuvet and results in an intolerable carry-over. Therefore, the use of the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method for the quantitative determination of proteins in urine and serum is not recommended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The quantitative determination of proteins in biological fluids, using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, was evaluated. Compared with the biuret method, the Coomassie Blue G-250 method needs a much shorter time for analysis and has a greater sensitivity. The sensitivity of the dye for albumin is significantly greater than for globulins. The standard curves for the biuret method are more linear than those for the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method. The Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method produces a precipitate, which sticks to the walls of the cuvet and results in an intolerable carry-over. Therefore, the use of the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method for the quantitative determination of proteins in urine and serum is not recommended.

Key concepts: Coomassie Brilliant Blue, Biuret test, Chromatography, Chemistry, Brilliant green, Albumin, Bradford protein assay, Quantitative analysis (chemistry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Criticism of the Use of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 for the Quantitative Determination of Proteins — Research Paper | ScholarLens