2009•PubMedRequires access

Different doses of oral folic acid for homocysteine-lowering therapy in patients on hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial.

Shahrzad Ossareh, Hossein Shayan-Moghaddam, A Bagher Salimi, Mojgan Asgari, Farhat Farrokhi

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We compared the effect of higher and lower doses of folic acid compared to our routine daily dose on plasma homocysteine levels, in our hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients on hemodialysis receiving oral folic acid, 10 mg/d, were randomized to receive folic acid at either doses of 5 mg/d (group 1) or 15 mg/d (group 2) for 2 months. Plasma levels of total homocysteine were measured before and after the study period. RESULTS: Hyperhomocysteinemia was seen in 75 patients (93.8%) before, and in 37 patients of group 1 (92.5%) and 39 of group 2 (97.5%) after the study period. In group 1, a nonsignificant decrease occurred in plasma homocysteine level (29.67 +/- 12.26 micromol/L to 27.78 +/- 9.94 micromol/L, P = .30), while in group 2, there was a significant decrease in homocysteine level (32.40 +/- 9.76 micromol/L to 29.58 +/- 9.62 micromol/L, P = .01). Changes in homocysteine level correlated with its baseline level (r = -0.42, P < .001). In both groups, significant reductions in homocysteine level were seen mostly in those patients with high baseline homocysteines. CONCLUSIONS: Routine folic acid supplementation of 10 mg/d could not normalize plasma homocysteine levels in most of our patients. Increasing folic acid dose made a statistically significant but clinically trivial decrease in homocysteine levels, and could not normalize homocysteine level in most patients. Patients with a higher baseline homocysteine level achieved a greater reduction, which may be explained by primary noncompliance of some patient. Further investigation of folic acid dosage is suggested.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: We compared the effect of higher and lower doses of folic acid compared to our routine daily dose on plasma homocysteine levels, in our hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients on hemodialysis receiving oral folic acid, 10 mg/d, were randomized to receive folic acid at either doses of 5 mg/d (group 1) or 15 mg/d (group 2) for 2 months. Plasma levels of total homocysteine were measured before and after the study period. RESULTS: Hyperhomocysteinemia was seen in 75 patients (93.8%) before, and in 37 patients of group 1 (92.5%) and 39 of group 2 (97.5%) after the study period. In group 1, a nonsignificant decrease occurred in plasma homocysteine level (29.67 +/- 12.26 micromol/L to 27.78 +/- 9.94 micromol/L, P = .30), while in group 2, there was a significant decrease in homocysteine level (32.40 +/- 9.76 micromol/L to 29.58 +/- 9.62 micromol/L, P = .01). Changes in homocysteine level correlated with its baseline level (r = -0.42, P < .001). In both groups, significant reductions in homocysteine level were seen mostly in those patients with high baseline homocysteines. CONCLUSIONS: Routine folic acid supplementation of 10 mg/d could not normalize plasma homocysteine levels in most of our patients. Increasing folic acid dose made a statistically significant but clinically trivial decrease in homocysteine levels, and could not normalize homocysteine level in most patients. Patients with a higher baseline homocysteine level achieved a greater reduction, which may be explained by primary noncompliance of some patient. Further investigation of folic acid dosage is suggested.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: We compared the effect of higher and lower doses of folic acid compared to our routine daily dose on plasma homocysteine levels, in our hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients on hemodialysis receiving oral folic acid, 10 mg/d, were randomized to receive folic acid at either doses of 5 mg/d (group 1) or 15 mg/d (group 2) for 2 months. Plasma levels of total homocysteine were measured before and after the study period. RESULTS: Hyperhomocysteinemia was seen in 75 patients (93.8%) before, and in 37 patients of group 1 (92.5%) and 39 of group 2 (97.5%) after the study period. In group 1, a nonsignificant decrease occurred in plasma homocysteine level (29.67 +/- 12.26 micromol/L to 27.78 +/- 9.94 micromol/L, P = .30), while in group 2, there was a significant decrease in homocysteine level (32.40 +/- 9.76 micromol/L to 29.58 +/- 9.62 micromol/L, P = .01). Changes in homocysteine level correlated with its baseline level (r = -0.42, P < .001). In both groups, significant reductions in homocysteine level were seen mostly in those patients with high baseline homocysteines. CONCLUSIONS: Routine folic acid supplementation of 10 mg/d could not normalize plasma homocysteine levels in most of our patients. Increasing folic acid dose made a statistically significant but clinically trivial decrease in homocysteine levels, and could not normalize homocysteine level in most patients. Patients with a higher baseline homocysteine level achieved a greater reduction, which may be explained by primary noncompliance of some patient. Further investigation of folic acid dosage is suggested.

Key concepts: Medicine, Homocysteine, Hyperhomocysteinemia, Internal medicine, Folic acid, Hemodialysis, Randomized controlled trial, Plasma homocysteine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Different doses of oral folic acid for homocysteine-lowering therapy in patients on hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. — Research Paper | ScholarLens