2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Integrated Flight and Propulsion Control for Loss-of-Control Prevention

James Fuller

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Gas turbine engines can produce substantial moments on their aircraft, which can be used for flight control. For situations where an aircraft faces adverse conditions (such as aero control surface damage or failures, runway incursions, or imminent loss of control), the engines offer the potential to augment aircraft controllability by providing differential thrust for steering and Dutch roll damping, modulated thrust for altitude and phugoid damping, and overthrust to shorten obstacle clearance distances. Engines have advantages in loss of control prevention which often requires urgent attitude changes despite uncertain aerodynamics and deteriorating control surface authority. Large correction moments can be applied via the engine mounts without violating airframe structural limits, and engine thrust performance can be maintained at higher angles of attack than can aero surface performance. Integrated flight and propulsion control to exploit this opportunity is relatively new and engine and flight controls need to be modified to accommodate it. First, the flight tests have shown that engine responses to small throttle motion were too slow to be effective in damping the underdamped aircraft phugoid and Dutch roll oscillations. The time constants of the engines and the oscillations were too close together. Second, the engine thrust response needs to be more precise than is typical. The amount of differential thrust needed for yaw control is only on the order of 1% of takeoff thrust. Finally, the engine must tolerate changing and asymmetric inlet conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Gas turbine engines can produce substantial moments on their aircraft, which can be used for flight control. For situations where an aircraft faces adverse conditions (such as aero control surface damage or failures, runway incursions, or imminent loss of control), the engines offer the potential to augment aircraft controllability by providing differential thrust for steering and Dutch roll damping, modulated thrust for altitude and phugoid damping, and overthrust to shorten obstacle clearance distances. Engines have advantages in loss of control prevention which often requires urgent attitude changes despite uncertain aerodynamics and deteriorating control surface authority. Large correction moments can be applied via the engine mounts without violating airframe structural limits, and engine thrust performance can be maintained at higher angles of attack than can aero surface performance. Integrated flight and propulsion control to exploit this opportunity is relatively new and engine and flight controls need to be modified to accommodate it. First, the flight tests have shown that engine responses to small throttle motion were too slow to be effective in damping the underdamped aircraft phugoid and Dutch roll oscillations. The time constants of the engines and the oscillations were too close together. Second, the engine thrust response needs to be more precise than is typical. The amount of differential thrust needed for yaw control is only on the order of 1% of takeoff thrust. Finally, the engine must tolerate changing and asymmetric inlet conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Gas turbine engines can produce substantial moments on their aircraft, which can be used for flight control. For situations where an aircraft faces adverse conditions (such as aero control surface damage or failures, runway incursions, or imminent loss of control), the engines offer the potential to augment aircraft controllability by providing differential thrust for steering and Dutch roll damping, modulated thrust for altitude and phugoid damping, and overthrust to shorten obstacle clearance distances. Engines have advantages in loss of control prevention which often requires urgent attitude changes despite uncertain aerodynamics and deteriorating control surface authority. Large correction moments can be applied via the engine mounts without violating airframe structural limits, and engine thrust performance can be maintained at higher angles of attack than can aero surface performance. Integrated flight and propulsion control to exploit this opportunity is relatively new and engine and flight controls need to be modified to accommodate it. First, the flight tests have shown that engine responses to small throttle motion were too slow to be effective in damping the underdamped aircraft phugoid and Dutch roll oscillations. The time constants of the engines and the oscillations were too close together. Second, the engine thrust response needs to be more precise than is typical. The amount of differential thrust needed for yaw control is only on the order of 1% of takeoff thrust. Finally, the engine must tolerate changing and asymmetric inlet conditions.

Key concepts: Thrust, Turbojet, Propulsion, Throttle, Takeoff, Airframe, Aerospace engineering, Aircraft flight mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Integrated Flight and Propulsion Control for Loss-of-Control Prevention — Research Paper | ScholarLens