2004•Forests Trees and LivelihoodsOpen access

COMMON PROPERTY AND COLLABORATIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT: RURAL DYNAMICS AND EVOLUTION IN COMMUNITY FORESTRY REGIMES

K. Freerk Wiersum, R. M. Singhal, Charlotte Benneker

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

International forest policies have been giving more attention to stimulating the involvement of local communities in forest management since the 1980s. Gradually the interest in common property management regimes in tropical countries has been extended to include collaborative management schemes and community forestry development in industrialized countries. This paper describes the multiple and dynamic meanings of community and analyses the various forms of dependency on forest resources within the framework of livelihoods and well-being. The evolution in community forestry is illustrated by examples from Europe. As a result of changing government policies and socio-economic development, both community management arrangements and forest dependency has gradually changed. The community organisations are increasingly based on common interests and social relations rather than on common residence, and the motivations to join such schemes are increasingly based on aesthetic, ecological and recreational benefits rather than material needs. These examples from Europe illustrate the multiple manifestations of community-based forest management and its dynamic nature. A thorough understanding of the scope and merits of common property forest management can best be obtained by assessing schemes in the dynamic context of socioeconomic development.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

International forest policies have been giving more attention to stimulating the involvement of local communities in forest management since the 1980s. Gradually the interest in common property management regimes in tropical countries has been extended to include collaborative management schemes and community forestry development in industrialized countries. This paper describes the multiple and dynamic meanings of community and analyses the various forms of dependency on forest resources within the framework of livelihoods and well-being. The evolution in community forestry is illustrated by examples from Europe. As a result of changing government policies and socio-economic development, both community management arrangements and forest dependency has gradually changed. The community organisations are increasingly based on common interests and social relations rather than on common residence, and the motivations to join such schemes are increasingly based on aesthetic, ecological and recreational benefits rather than material needs. These examples from Europe illustrate the multiple manifestations of community-based forest management and its dynamic nature. A thorough understanding of the scope and merits of common property forest management can best be obtained by assessing schemes in the dynamic context of socioeconomic development.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

International forest policies have been giving more attention to stimulating the involvement of local communities in forest management since the 1980s. Gradually the interest in common property management regimes in tropical countries has been extended to include collaborative management schemes and community forestry development in industrialized countries. This paper describes the multiple and dynamic meanings of community and analyses the various forms of dependency on forest resources within the framework of livelihoods and well-being. The evolution in community forestry is illustrated by examples from Europe. As a result of changing government policies and socio-economic development, both community management arrangements and forest dependency has gradually changed. The community organisations are increasingly based on common interests and social relations rather than on common residence, and the motivations to join such schemes are increasingly based on aesthetic, ecological and recreational benefits rather than material needs. These examples from Europe illustrate the multiple manifestations of community-based forest management and its dynamic nature. A thorough understanding of the scope and merits of common property forest management can best be obtained by assessing schemes in the dynamic context of socioeconomic development.

Key concepts: Forest management, Community forestry, Property (philosophy), Forestry, Dynamics (music), Geography, Environmental resource management, Agroforestry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMMON PROPERTY AND COLLABORATIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT: RURAL DYNAMICS AND EVOLUTION IN COMMUNITY FORESTRY REGIMES — Research Paper | ScholarLens