1986Schizophrenia BulletinOpen access

Prediction of Long-term Outcome in Schizophrenia by Prognostic Scales

H.‐J. Möller, W. Schmid‐Bode, D. von Zerssen

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

The predictive validity of four prognostic scales described in the literature (Gittelman-Klein Scale, Goldstein Scale, Phillips Scale, Strauss-Carpenter Scale) and of four newly developed prognostic scores was tested in two long-term followup studies on schizophrenic patients. Among the prognostic scales of the literature, the Strauss-Carpenter Scale showed the best results; it reached a level that was attained by only three of the newly developed scales. The three other scales of the literature could also prove their predictive validity. It may be concluded from the results that a scale has a comparatively high predictive value when certain dimensions and aspects are considered but that a certain maximum cannot, in general, be exceeded--even if more items are added to the prognostic scale. A higher number of items may be able to guarantee a better stability of predictive power in different samples.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The predictive validity of four prognostic scales described in the literature (Gittelman-Klein Scale, Goldstein Scale, Phillips Scale, Strauss-Carpenter Scale) and of four newly developed prognostic scores was tested in two long-term followup studies on schizophrenic patients. Among the prognostic scales of the literature, the Strauss-Carpenter Scale showed the best results; it reached a level that was attained by only three of the newly developed scales. The three other scales of the literature could also prove their predictive validity. It may be concluded from the results that a scale has a comparatively high predictive value when certain dimensions and aspects are considered but that a certain maximum cannot, in general, be exceeded--even if more items are added to the prognostic scale. A higher number of items may be able to guarantee a better stability of predictive power in different samples.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The predictive validity of four prognostic scales described in the literature (Gittelman-Klein Scale, Goldstein Scale, Phillips Scale, Strauss-Carpenter Scale) and of four newly developed prognostic scores was tested in two long-term followup studies on schizophrenic patients. Among the prognostic scales of the literature, the Strauss-Carpenter Scale showed the best results; it reached a level that was attained by only three of the newly developed scales. The three other scales of the literature could also prove their predictive validity. It may be concluded from the results that a scale has a comparatively high predictive value when certain dimensions and aspects are considered but that a certain maximum cannot, in general, be exceeded--even if more items are added to the prognostic scale. A higher number of items may be able to guarantee a better stability of predictive power in different samples.

Key concepts: Predictive validity, Scale (ratio), Predictive value, Predictive power, Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming), Term (time), Psychology, Outcome (game theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prediction of Long-term Outcome in Schizophrenia by Prognostic Scales — Research Paper | ScholarLens