2001•The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and CareRequires access

Accuracy of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Impact on Diabetes Management Decisions During Pregnancy

M. Joann Henry, Carol A. Major, Sibylle Reinsch

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that the accuracy of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values of patients with diabetes during pregnancy deviates substantially from reference values. METHODS: The patients' glucose values were measured on 6 different SMBG meters; reference values were from the HemoCue B Glucose Analyzer. Over a 5-year period, 1973 comparisons between SMBG values and reference values were recorded during clinic visits and used for this study. Data were analyzed for percent of values that varied more than +/- 10.5% and +/- 15.5% from the reference value. Out-of-range data at each variance level were analyzed to determine the impact on medical management if decisions were based solely on SMBG values. RESULTS: One third of SMBG readings deviated significantly, which could adversely affect treatment for half of these patients if diabetes management was based on SMBG values. At the 10.5% deviation level, 34% of SMBG meter readings were out of range; 54% of these would have implied erroneous treatment. At the 15.5% deviation level, 18% were out of range; 63% of these would have implied erroneous management. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of home meters should be verified at regular intervals, and SMBG values should not be the sole criterion for diabetes management during pregnancy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that the accuracy of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values of patients with diabetes during pregnancy deviates substantially from reference values. METHODS: The patients' glucose values were measured on 6 different SMBG meters; reference values were from the HemoCue B Glucose Analyzer. Over a 5-year period, 1973 comparisons between SMBG values and reference values were recorded during clinic visits and used for this study. Data were analyzed for percent of values that varied more than +/- 10.5% and +/- 15.5% from the reference value. Out-of-range data at each variance level were analyzed to determine the impact on medical management if decisions were based solely on SMBG values. RESULTS: One third of SMBG readings deviated significantly, which could adversely affect treatment for half of these patients if diabetes management was based on SMBG values. At the 10.5% deviation level, 34% of SMBG meter readings were out of range; 54% of these would have implied erroneous treatment. At the 15.5% deviation level, 18% were out of range; 63% of these would have implied erroneous management. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of home meters should be verified at regular intervals, and SMBG values should not be the sole criterion for diabetes management during pregnancy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that the accuracy of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values of patients with diabetes during pregnancy deviates substantially from reference values. METHODS: The patients' glucose values were measured on 6 different SMBG meters; reference values were from the HemoCue B Glucose Analyzer. Over a 5-year period, 1973 comparisons between SMBG values and reference values were recorded during clinic visits and used for this study. Data were analyzed for percent of values that varied more than +/- 10.5% and +/- 15.5% from the reference value. Out-of-range data at each variance level were analyzed to determine the impact on medical management if decisions were based solely on SMBG values. RESULTS: One third of SMBG readings deviated significantly, which could adversely affect treatment for half of these patients if diabetes management was based on SMBG values. At the 10.5% deviation level, 34% of SMBG meter readings were out of range; 54% of these would have implied erroneous treatment. At the 15.5% deviation level, 18% were out of range; 63% of these would have implied erroneous management. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of home meters should be verified at regular intervals, and SMBG values should not be the sole criterion for diabetes management during pregnancy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Diabetes in pregnancy, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Pregnancy, Diabetes management, Target range, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Accuracy of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Impact on Diabetes Management Decisions During Pregnancy — Research Paper | ScholarLens