2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Automatically Building Service Evaluation Metadata in a Grid Environment

Zhihui Du, Lei Wu, Suihui Zhu, Yinong Chen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a mechanism that automatically build evaluation metadata for grid services by using the information from the execution of different applications. A new MetaService AMDBS, automatic metadata building service, is designed to support this mechanism. The typical feature of this mechanism is that it can get not only the absolute evaluation information, but also the relative global ranking result through the collaboration of different AMDBSs. Web service group testing is used as an example of a grid application to accelerate the process of evaluation metadata building. Simulation experiment results show that the HP (heavy-powerful) algorithm which is designed based on the dynamic evaluation metadata can improve the application performance significantly, compared with the RR (round-robin) algorithm which does not use the evaluation metadata. The effect of using evaluation metadata in different task and resource conditions is also demonstrated by experiment results

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a mechanism that automatically build evaluation metadata for grid services by using the information from the execution of different applications. A new MetaService AMDBS, automatic metadata building service, is designed to support this mechanism. The typical feature of this mechanism is that it can get not only the absolute evaluation information, but also the relative global ranking result through the collaboration of different AMDBSs. Web service group testing is used as an example of a grid application to accelerate the process of evaluation metadata building. Simulation experiment results show that the HP (heavy-powerful) algorithm which is designed based on the dynamic evaluation metadata can improve the application performance significantly, compared with the RR (round-robin) algorithm which does not use the evaluation metadata. The effect of using evaluation metadata in different task and resource conditions is also demonstrated by experiment results

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a mechanism that automatically build evaluation metadata for grid services by using the information from the execution of different applications. A new MetaService AMDBS, automatic metadata building service, is designed to support this mechanism. The typical feature of this mechanism is that it can get not only the absolute evaluation information, but also the relative global ranking result through the collaboration of different AMDBSs. Web service group testing is used as an example of a grid application to accelerate the process of evaluation metadata building. Simulation experiment results show that the HP (heavy-powerful) algorithm which is designed based on the dynamic evaluation metadata can improve the application performance significantly, compared with the RR (round-robin) algorithm which does not use the evaluation metadata. The effect of using evaluation metadata in different task and resource conditions is also demonstrated by experiment results

Key concepts: Metadata, Computer science, Meta Data Services, Semantic grid, Ranking (information retrieval), Grid, Service (business), Metadata repository

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Automatically Building Service Evaluation Metadata in a Grid Environment — Research Paper | ScholarLens