2009Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic SciencesOpen access

Impact of residual in situ carcinoma on postoperative survival in 125 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma

Yoshitsugu Nakanishi, Satoshi Kondo, Yoh Zen, Atsuya Yonemori, Kanako Kubota, Hiroshi Kawakami, Eiichi Tanaka, Satoshi Hirano, Tomoo Itoh, Yasuni Nakanuma

Open full text 58 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the presence of carcinoma in situ at the bile duct stump on postoperative survival in patients who underwent resection of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. METHODS: The patients with resected extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma were divided into three groups according to resected margin status: no evidence of residual carcinoma (Negative group, n = 96); carcinoma in situ at the bile duct stump (CIS group, n = 10); and invasive carcinoma at any surgical margin (Invasive group, n = 19). Cause-specific survival for these groups was compared statistically. RESULTS: Surgical margin status was identified as a prognostic factor on univariate analysis (p = 0.005) and was an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.018). The CIS group displayed significantly better survival than the Invasive group (p = 0.006), and the survival was comparable to that for the Negative group (p = 0.533). Two of three patients in the CIS group with local recurrence died >5 years after surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with positive ductal margins of carcinoma in situ of the extrahepatic bile duct do not appear to show different survival after resection compared to patients with negative margins, but remnant carcinoma in situ is likely to develop late local recurrence.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the presence of carcinoma in situ at the bile duct stump on postoperative survival in patients who underwent resection of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. METHODS: The patients with resected extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma were divided into three groups according to resected margin status: no evidence of residual carcinoma (Negative group, n = 96); carcinoma in situ at the bile duct stump (CIS group, n = 10); and invasive carcinoma at any surgical margin (Invasive group, n = 19). Cause-specific survival for these groups was compared statistically. RESULTS: Surgical margin status was identified as a prognostic factor on univariate analysis (p = 0.005) and was an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.018). The CIS group displayed significantly better survival than the Invasive group (p = 0.006), and the survival was comparable to that for the Negative group (p = 0.533). Two of three patients in the CIS group with local recurrence died >5 years after surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with positive ductal margins of carcinoma in situ of the extrahepatic bile duct do not appear to show different survival after resection compared to patients with negative margins, but remnant carcinoma in situ is likely to develop late local recurrence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the presence of carcinoma in situ at the bile duct stump on postoperative survival in patients who underwent resection of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. METHODS: The patients with resected extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma were divided into three groups according to resected margin status: no evidence of residual carcinoma (Negative group, n = 96); carcinoma in situ at the bile duct stump (CIS group, n = 10); and invasive carcinoma at any surgical margin (Invasive group, n = 19). Cause-specific survival for these groups was compared statistically. RESULTS: Surgical margin status was identified as a prognostic factor on univariate analysis (p = 0.005) and was an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.018). The CIS group displayed significantly better survival than the Invasive group (p = 0.006), and the survival was comparable to that for the Negative group (p = 0.533). Two of three patients in the CIS group with local recurrence died >5 years after surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with positive ductal margins of carcinoma in situ of the extrahepatic bile duct do not appear to show different survival after resection compared to patients with negative margins, but remnant carcinoma in situ is likely to develop late local recurrence.

Key concepts: Bile Duct Carcinoma, Medicine, Carcinoma, Bile duct, Surgical margin, Resection margin, Univariate analysis, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of residual in situ carcinoma on postoperative survival in 125 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens