Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment
George E. Cheney, Phillip K. Tompkins
Abstract
George E. Cheney, Phillip K. Tompkins
Abstract
The concepts of organizational identification and organizational commitment are examined in an effort to explicate both their interrelations and their distinctiveness. The essay establishes identification as a term referring to the “substance” of individual‐organizational relationships and commitment as referring to their form.
OpenAlex reports 313 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The concepts of organizational identification and organizational commitment are examined in an effort to explicate both their interrelations and their distinctiveness. The essay establishes identification as a term referring to the “substance” of individual‐organizational relationships and commitment as referring to their form.
Key concepts: Optimal distinctiveness theory, Organizational identification, Organizational commitment, Identification (biology), Organization development, Organizational learning, Psychology, Organizational studies