2009Zhongguo redai yixueRequires access

Comparison of methods for detection of entervirus.

Yajing Wang, Hong Xiao, Wang Bingshu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare and assess the methods for detection of enterovirus.Methods The methods of RT -PCR and real time PCR for detection of enterovirus from feces of patients were used and the results of detective experiments were analyzed by SPSS software.Results In the detection of enterovirus 71 and CoxA16,the results obtained by using the RT-CR and real time PCR were consistent and real time PCR was more sensitive than PCR.The difference between the two methods was not significant,and strong coincidence was observed in the two methods.But for enterovirus,the difference between the two methods was significant.Conclusion Detection of enterovirus 71 and CoxA16 from clinical samples with RT -PCR and real time PCR methods are stable and reliable,but real time PCR method is more sensitive than RT-PCR and it can also minimize cross contaminations in the laboratory.But the real time PCR method shoud be improved for detection of enterovirus.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare and assess the methods for detection of enterovirus.Methods The methods of RT -PCR and real time PCR for detection of enterovirus from feces of patients were used and the results of detective experiments were analyzed by SPSS software.Results In the detection of enterovirus 71 and CoxA16,the results obtained by using the RT-CR and real time PCR were consistent and real time PCR was more sensitive than PCR.The difference between the two methods was not significant,and strong coincidence was observed in the two methods.But for enterovirus,the difference between the two methods was significant.Conclusion Detection of enterovirus 71 and CoxA16 from clinical samples with RT -PCR and real time PCR methods are stable and reliable,but real time PCR method is more sensitive than RT-PCR and it can also minimize cross contaminations in the laboratory.But the real time PCR method shoud be improved for detection of enterovirus.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare and assess the methods for detection of enterovirus.Methods The methods of RT -PCR and real time PCR for detection of enterovirus from feces of patients were used and the results of detective experiments were analyzed by SPSS software.Results In the detection of enterovirus 71 and CoxA16,the results obtained by using the RT-CR and real time PCR were consistent and real time PCR was more sensitive than PCR.The difference between the two methods was not significant,and strong coincidence was observed in the two methods.But for enterovirus,the difference between the two methods was significant.Conclusion Detection of enterovirus 71 and CoxA16 from clinical samples with RT -PCR and real time PCR methods are stable and reliable,but real time PCR method is more sensitive than RT-PCR and it can also minimize cross contaminations in the laboratory.But the real time PCR method shoud be improved for detection of enterovirus.

Key concepts: Real-time polymerase chain reaction, Enterovirus, Significant difference, Enterovirus 71, Virology, Biology, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of methods for detection of entervirus. — Research Paper | ScholarLens