2006•Unpublished venueRequires access

Radiated Immunity Tests: Reverberation Chamber vs. Anechoic Chamber Results

R. De Leo, Valter Mariani Primiani

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The paper concerns the comparison between reverberation chamber measurements (RC) and anechoic chamber (AC) measurements: in particular, the case of an immunity test is considered. A two-wire transmission line is adopted as a device under test (DUT), and the current induced on the line by the external field is monitored to construct a possible susceptibility profile. Both the averaged current, over the stirrer rotation, and the maximum current are considered to show how robust is the RC measurement against the positioning and the orientation of the DUT inside the chamber. As expected from theory, the maximum value is related to the average one by means of the number of the independent position of the stirrer. Finally, it is highlighted how in RC it is possible to lost some worst case situations, related to a particular incident field polarization and incoming direction, and the underestimation of the induced current depends upon the chosen number of the stirrer positions

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper concerns the comparison between reverberation chamber measurements (RC) and anechoic chamber (AC) measurements: in particular, the case of an immunity test is considered. A two-wire transmission line is adopted as a device under test (DUT), and the current induced on the line by the external field is monitored to construct a possible susceptibility profile. Both the averaged current, over the stirrer rotation, and the maximum current are considered to show how robust is the RC measurement against the positioning and the orientation of the DUT inside the chamber. As expected from theory, the maximum value is related to the average one by means of the number of the independent position of the stirrer. Finally, it is highlighted how in RC it is possible to lost some worst case situations, related to a particular incident field polarization and incoming direction, and the underestimation of the induced current depends upon the chosen number of the stirrer positions

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper concerns the comparison between reverberation chamber measurements (RC) and anechoic chamber (AC) measurements: in particular, the case of an immunity test is considered. A two-wire transmission line is adopted as a device under test (DUT), and the current induced on the line by the external field is monitored to construct a possible susceptibility profile. Both the averaged current, over the stirrer rotation, and the maximum current are considered to show how robust is the RC measurement against the positioning and the orientation of the DUT inside the chamber. As expected from theory, the maximum value is related to the average one by means of the number of the independent position of the stirrer. Finally, it is highlighted how in RC it is possible to lost some worst case situations, related to a particular incident field polarization and incoming direction, and the underestimation of the induced current depends upon the chosen number of the stirrer positions

Key concepts: Anechoic chamber, Electromagnetic reverberation chamber, Acoustics, Device under test, Polarization (electrochemistry), Rotation (mathematics), Transmission line, Current (fluid)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Radiated Immunity Tests: Reverberation Chamber vs. Anechoic Chamber Results — Research Paper | ScholarLens